Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36003526›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022

Epidemiology and Survival of Kaposi's Sarcoma by Race in the United States: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Analysis.

Sara D Ragi, Isabelle Moseley, Samantha Ouellette, Babar Rao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara D RagiThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9369-6216
Isabelle MoseleyThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Samantha OuelletteDepartment of Dermatology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Babar RaoDepartment of Dermatology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Brown University · USJohnson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) has led to a significant decrease in the incidence of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) in recent years. However, a concomitant increase in racial disparities in KS has arisen. Here, we analyze data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program for epidemiology and survival of Kaposi's sarcoma by race. The highest incidence was observed among Black patients (incidence rate (IR), 1.189; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.092-1.189), followed by White patients (IR, 0.486; 95% CI, 0.473-0.498). Relative survival at 1, 3, and 5 years differed significantly by race, with White patients having the highest survival rates (84.26%, 77.79%, and 74.79% at 1, 3, and 5 years respectively) and Black patients demonstrating the lowest (71.50%, 61.37%, and 57.38%), with intermediate survival rates in Asians/Pacific Islanders (AAPI) (80.62%, 71.19%, and 67.28%) and American Indians/Alaska Natives (AIAN) (80.56%, 61.45%, and 61.45%). We conclude that there are significant racial disparities in the incidence, epidemiology, and survival of KS.

Indexed as

cancerend results programepidemiologyKaposi’s sarcomaraceracial disparitiessoft tissue sarcomasurveillance

Identifiers

PMID36003526
PMCPMC9394645
OpenAlexW4292487810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.