Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36003398›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Detailed spatial immunophenotyping of primary melanomas reveals immune cell subpopulations associated with patient outcome.

Grace H Attrill, Hansol Lee, Annie T Tasker, Nurudeen A Adegoke, Angela L Ferguson, Ines Pires da Silva, Robyn P M Saw, John F Thompson, Umaimainthan Palendira, Georgina V Long and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The tumor immune microenvironment in primary cutaneous melanoma.Archives of dermatological research · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. CD8Immunity · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Grace H AttrillMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hansol LeeMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Annie T TaskerMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nurudeen A AdegokeMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Angela L FergusonFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ines Pires da SilvaMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Robyn P M SawMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
John F ThompsonMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Umaimainthan PalendiraMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Georgina V LongMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter M FergusonMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Richard A ScolyerMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
James S WilmottMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUMelanoma Institute Australia · AUCentenary Institute · AUMater Health Services · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of metastatic melanoma has been well characterized, the primary melanoma TIME is comparatively poorly understood. Additionally, although the association of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes with primary melanoma patient outcome has been known for decades, it is not considered in the current AJCC melanoma staging system. Detailed immune phenotyping of advanced melanoma has revealed multiple immune biomarkers, including the presence of CD8+ T-cells, for predicting response to immunotherapies. However, in primary melanomas, immune biomarkers are lacking and CD8+ T-cells have yet to be extensively characterized. As recent studies combining immune features and clinicopathologic characteristics have created more accurate predictive models, this study sought to characterize the TIME of primary melanomas and identify predictors of patient outcome. We first phenotyped CD8+ T cells in fresh stage II primary melanomas using flow cytometry (n = 6), identifying a CD39+ tumor-resident CD8+ T-cell subset enriched for PD-1 expression. We then performed Opal multiplex immunohistochemistry and quantitative pathology-based immune profiling of CD8+ T-cell subsets, along with B cells, NK cells, Langerhans cells and Class I MHC expression in stage II primary melanoma specimens from patients with long-term follow-up (n = 66), comparing patients based on their recurrence status at 5 years after primary diagnosis. A CD39+CD103+PD-1- CD8+ T-cell population (P2) comprised a significantly higher proportion of intratumoral and stromal CD8+ T-cells in patients with recurrence-free survival (RFS) ≥5 years

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsBiomarkersCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansImmunophenotypingTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkersClinicopathological featuresimmunophenotypingprimary melanomaspatial pathologyT cell phenotypes

Identifiers

PMID36003398
PMCPMC9393646
OpenAlexW4290612765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.