Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36003388›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Current therapeutic strategies and perspectives in refractory ITP: What have we learned recently?

Yue Lv, Huiping Shi, Hong Liu, Lu Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Evaluation ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim Versus Placebo in Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue LvDepartment of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Huiping ShiSoochow University Medical College, Suzhou, China.
Hong LiuDepartment of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Lu ZhouDepartment of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital and Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune bleeding disorder featured by increased platelet destruction and deficient megakaryocyte maturation. First-line treatments include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and intravenous anti-D immunoglobulin. Second-line treatments consist of rituximab, thrombopoietin receptor agonists and splenectomy. Although most patients benefit from these treatments, an individualized treatment approach is warranted due to the large heterogeneity among ITP patients. In addition, ITP patients may relapse and there remains a subset of patients who become refractory to treatments. The management of these refractory patients is still a challenge. This review aims to summarize emerging therapeutic approaches for refractory ITP in several categories according to their different targets, including macrophages, platelets/megakaryocytes, T cells, B cells, and endothelial cells. Moreover, current management strategies and combination regimens of refractory ITP are also discussed.

Indexed as

Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, IdiopathicThrombocytopeniaBlood PlateletsEndothelial CellsHumansPlatelet CountSplenectomyautoimmunitydesialylationfostamatinibplateletrefractory immune thrombocytopenia

Identifiers

PMID36003388
PMCPMC9393521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.