ReviewCurrent research in insect science2022
Mounting evidence that managed and introduced bees have negative impacts on wild bees: an updated review.
Review in Current research in insect science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Weak evidence base for bee protective pesticide mitigation measures.Journal of economic entomology · 2023Pooled it
- Timescale mismatch: redefining ecological opportunity for evolution in the Anthropocene.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- The evolution of the immune system of bees is defined by conservation, expansions, and losses.BMC biology · 2026Article
- The utility and use of solitary bees for pollination in greenhouses and other covered growing systems: A review.Current research in insect science · 2026Review
- Bacterial communities of wild bee species and the western honey bee (Apis mellifera) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea): Alpine insights.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2025Article
- The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Stingless BeeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Examining Honeybee (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Review
- Investigation and Study on the Biology and Morphology ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Low-density migratory beekeeping induces intermediate disturbance effects on native bee communities in Tibetan Plateau alpine meadows.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2024Article
- Multi-method approach to assessing the floral-visiting insect assemblage of rare, abophilous plantEcology and evolution · 2024Article
- Mixed effects of honey bees on pollination function in the Tibetan alpine grasslands.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Nutritional position of managed honey bees during pollination of native plants by the melissopalynology method.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Tracking Existing Factors Directly Affecting the Reproduction of Bumblebees: Current Knowledge.Insects · 2024Review
- Pollination Ecology, Breeding System, and Conservation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Niche analyses and the potential distribution of four invasive bumblebees worldwide.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Biodiversity measures of a grassland plant-pollinator community are resilient to the introduction of honey bees (Apis mellifera).PloS one · 2024Article
- Bee Well: a positive psychological impact of a pro-environmental intervention on beekeepers' and their families' wellbeing.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Neglecting non-bee pollinators may lead to substantial underestimation of competition risk among pollinators.Current research in insect science · 2024Review
- The final frontier: ecological and evolutionary dynamics of a global parasite invasion.Biology letters · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, the use of managed bees for crop pollination and honey production has increased dramatically. Concerns about the pressures of these increases on native ecosystems has resulted in a recent expansion in the literature on this subject. To collate and update current knowledge, we performed a systematic review of the literature on the effects of managed and introduced bees on native ecosystems, focusing on the effects on wild bees. To enable comparison over time, we used the same search terms and focused on the same impacts as earlier reviews. This review covers: (a) interference and resource competition between introduced or managed bees and native bees; (b) effects of introduced or managed bees on pollination of native plants and weeds; and (c) transmission and infectivity of pathogens; and classifies effects into positive, negative, or neutral. Compared to a 2017 review, we found that the number of papers on this issue has increased by 47%. The highest increase was seen in papers on pathogen spill-over, but in the last five years considerable additional information about competition between managed and wild bees has also become available. Records of negative effects have increased from 53% of papers reporting negative effects in 2017 to 66% at present. The majority of these studies investigated effects on visitation and foraging behaviour. While only a few studies experimentally assessed impacts on wild bee reproductive output, 78% of these demonstrated negative effects. Plant composition and pollination was negatively affected in 7% of studies, and 79% of studies on pathogens reported potential negative effects of managed or introduced bees on wild bees. Taken together, the evidence increasingly suggests that managed and introduced bees negatively affect wild bees, and this knowledge should inform actions to prevent further harm to native ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.