Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36003246›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2022

COVID-19: Distance learning to empower educators and health assistants in rural areas.

Maria do Carmo Barros de Melo, Priscila Menezes Ferri, Monica Maria Almeida de Vasconcelos, Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis, Solange Cervinho Bicalho Godoy, Vitória Andrade Palmeira, Gabriel Rocha, Rosalia Morais Torres, Unaí Tupinambás

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Students' Assessment of Digital Technologies in Nursing Education.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria do Carmo Barros de MeloDepartment of Pediatrics, Member of Health Technology Center and Telehealth Center. Coordinator of Simulation Center, Faculty of Medicine at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Priscila Menezes FerriDepartment of Pediatrics, Subcoordinator of Simulation Cente, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Monica Maria Almeida de VasconcelosDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Zilma Silveira Nogueira ReisDepartment of Obstetric Gynecology, Coordinator of Health Informatics Center, Faculty of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Solange Cervinho Bicalho GodoyDepartment of Basic Nursing, Coordinator of Telehealth Center, Nursing School Teacher, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Vitória Andrade PalmeiraMedicine Student, Faculty of Medicine - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Gabriel RochaMedicine Student, Faculty of Medicine - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Rosalia Morais TorresDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Member of Health Technology Center and Telehealth Center, Faculty of Medicine at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Unaí TupinambásDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEducators and health assistants can act as key players in controlling the pandemic. In general, they are respected by the community, especially in rural areas, and can help guide and raise the population's awareness of preventive measures. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the results in knowledge progress of an e-learning course offered to educators and health assistants by a public university and to analyze the profile and satisfaction of the participants. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single group pre- and post-test design based on a questionnaire, interventional, study was conducted in the period from April 20

resultsA total of 674 participants were enrolled in the five groups, and 583 concluded the course (86.5%). The reasons for those who did not access the entire course (

conclusionsThe course contributed to the training of health assistants and educators, preparing them to act in a participatory way in the prevention and control of the pandemic. The course was well evaluated and there was a progression of knowledge by the participants.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19e-learningpandemicspublic health

Identifiers

PMID36003246
PMCPMC9393942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.