ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2022
A review on attraction factors of science and technology parks to firms in health sector.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the past few years, a rapidly growing number of science and technology parks (STPs) in health sector have emerged across the world. There has been little discussion in the literature to show how STPs could make an attractive environment to absorb and retain potential firms. This is even more challenging for specialized STPs in health sector. The aim of this study is to identify the attractive factors for firms in a STP in health sector. MATERIALS AND
methodsA scoping review method was undertaken to review the literature on seven databases (ScienceDirect, Scopus, ProQuest, Google Scholar, EconPapers, PubMed, and ISI Web of Science) for peer-reviewed articles published until 2019. The search results were screened against the inclusion of criteria to ensure they met the objectives. The eligible papers were then assessed on the basis of the full text, and finally the results were extracted.
resultsThe attractive factors for firms and talents in multidimensional STPs and those in health sector are extracted and summarized. The attractive factors of multidimensional STPs, which includes health sector firms, and those specialized in health sector are summarized in three main categories; factors created by government and universities, and factors related to STP policies and those expected by the firms.
conclusionTo make STPs attractive for firms in health sector, there is a list of factors that are required to be done not only by STP itself, but also by the national and local government and industries. It is important to consider the factors that are expected by the firms to be implemented. The results of this study suggest that making STPs attractive for health sector firms needs close collaboration between government, universities, related industries, and STPs all together.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.