ArticleJTCVS open2020
Evaluation of personalized right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduits using in silico design and computational analysis of flow.
Article in JTCVS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Personalized and genetically engineered animal models for next-generation surgical implant validation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Article
- Commentary: In silico design of right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduits-confirmation of "in cerebral" design?JTCVS open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Right ventricle to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) conduits are required for the surgical management of pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect and truncus arteriosus. Bioengineered RV-PA connections may address some of the shortcomings of homografts and xenografts, such as lack of growth potential and structural deterioration and may be manufactured to accommodate patient-specific anatomy. The aim of this study was to develop a methodology for in silico patient-specific design and analysis of RV-PA conduits. Methods: Cross-sectional imaging was obtained from patients with truncus arteriosus (n = 5) and pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect (n = 5) who underwent complete repair with a RV-PA conduit. Three-dimensional models of the heart were constructed by segmentation of the right ventricle, existing conduit, branch pulmonary arteries, and surrounding structures. A customized conduit design for each patient was proposed. Computational fluid dynamics analysis was performed and outputs, including wall shear stress and energy loss, were used to compare the performance of the existing conduits and the customized geometries. Results: In this study, a methodology for patient-specific analysis of RV-PA conduit in silico was developed. The results of simulations for 10 patients showed between 23% and 56% decrease in the average wall shear stress and between 24% and 87% reduction in average power requirements in customized designs compared with the stenosed conduits, translating into better hemodynamic performance. Conclusions: Creation of an optimal conduit for an individual patient can be achieved using surgeon-guided design and computational fluid dynamics analysis. Manufacture of personalized RV-PA conduits may obviate the need for surgical customization to accommodate existing materials and provide superior long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.