ArticleJTCVS open2021
Novel composite trachea grafts using 3-dimensional printing.
Article in JTCVS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D printing as an innovative tool in personalized management of complex airway diseases: a literature review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Vat Photopolymerization of Smart Polymers for Biomedical Applications.ACS applied polymer materials · 2025Review
- Advancements in lung regeneration: from bench to bedside.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Biocompatibility of three-dimensional thermoplastic elastomer implants compared to that of the sternocephalic muscle flap in repairing partial tracheal defects in New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2025Article
- Improved Composite Hydrogel for Bioengineered Tracheal Graft Demonstrates Effective Early Angiogenesis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Identifying Molecular Pathophysiology and Potential Therapeutic Options in Iatrogenic Tracheal Stenosis.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in the Application of 3D-Printing Bioinks Based on Decellularized Extracellular Matrix in Tissue Engineering.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Enhancing cartilage regeneration and repair through bioactive and biomechanical modification of 3D acellular dermal matrix.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- Surgical Innovations in Tracheal Reconstruction: A Review on Synthetic Material Fabrication.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Biomaterials Adapted to Vat Photopolymerization in 3D Printing: Characteristics and Medical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Evaluation of a decellularized bronchial patch transplant in a porcine model.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Current Status and Future Outlook of Additive Manufacturing Technologies for the Reconstruction of the Trachea.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Commentary: The search for a breakthrough in tracheal replacement surgery: The good, the bad, and the downright ugly.JTCVS open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Porcine-derived small intestine submucosa (SIS) extracellular matrix (ECM) surgical patches claim to have greater regenerative properties compared with dermal extracellular matrices. We hypothesized that using SIS-ECM in a bioengineered composite tracheal graft would allow better incorporation into the native tissue. Methods: Two types of size-matched polycaprolactone support scaffolds were designed: rigid and flexible. The SIS-ECM was wrapped around the polycaprolactone supports lining the inside and outside of the graft. The grafts were implanted in 4 Yorkshire pigs, replacing an ∼2 cm segment of native trachea. Airway patency was evaluated with computed tomography scans and explanted grafts were examined grossly and histologically. Results: All animals survived through the immediate postoperative period. Generally, extraluminal examination showed a smooth transition between native and graft without significant volumetric loss. Animals that received the flexible design survived ∼10 days longer than those that received the rigid design; however, severe perianastomotic intraluminal granulation tissue was observed. The rigid design had less significant intraluminal granulation tissue development at the distal anastomosis, but partial dehiscence had occurred at the proximal anastomosis interrupting graft incorporation. Conclusions: The generally good extraluminal graft incorporation in our composite tracheal graft highlights some increased regenerative capabilities of SIS-ECM. However, the presence of intraluminal granulation tissue indicates that its use as an off-the-shelf, unaltered substrate in an airway graft is still not ideal. Further research must be conducted to determine whether a modification of the substrate is possible to enhance luminal airway incorporation and to exert control over the mechanisms responsible for granulation tissue development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.