Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36003129›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection prevention2022

COVID-19 contact tracing in the hospitals located in the North Denmark region: A retrospective review.

Dorte Fromberg, Nina Ank, Hans L Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection prevention, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dorte FrombergDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3150-0393
Nina AnkDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7149-3752
Hans L NielsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2370-417X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Department of Infection Control, at our University Hospital conducted contact tracing of COVID-19 positive patients and staff members at all hospitals in the North Denmark Region. Aim: To describe the contact tracing performed during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Region and its outcomes. Methods: Data from each contact tracing were collected prospectively during 14 May 2020-26 May 2021. Data included information about the index case (patient or hospital staff member), presentation (asymptomatic vs symptomatic), probable source of transmission (community-acquired or hospital-acquired), number of close contacts and if any of these were SARS-CoV-2 PCR-test positive. Findings: 362 contact tracing were performed. A total of 573 COVID-19 positive cases were identified among 171 (30%) patients and 402 (70%) staff members. 192 (34%) of all cases were tested due to symptoms of COVID-19, whereas two-third were tested for other reasons including outbreak and systematic screening tests. A total of 1575 close contacts were identified, including 225 (14%) patients and 1350 (86%) staff members. 100 (6%) close contacts, including 24 patients and 76 staff members, were infected with SARS-CoV-2, of which 33 (43%) staff members was positive at day 0 i.e. the same day as being identified as close contacts. Discussion: We found a three to one of close contacts to each index case, but only 6% became SARS-CoV-2 positive, with a surprisingly high number of those identified at day 0. Our data confirm that regular testing of patients and staff will identify asymptomatic carriers and thereby prevent new cases.

Indexed as

close contactscontact tracingcoronavirusinfection controlSARS-CoV-2The COVID-19 pandemic

Identifiers

PMID36003129
PMCPMC9207588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.