Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36003126›Full record

ReviewJornal vascular brasileiro2022

Surgical access to the distal cervical segment of the internal carotid artery and to a high carotid bifurcation - integrative literature review and protocol proposal.

Nicolau Conte, Thais Tapajós Gonçalves, Clarina Louis, Jonas Ikikame, Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes Junior

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolau ConteCentro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA, Belém, PA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-5152-1277
Thais Tapajós GonçalvesUniversidade Federal do Pará - UFPA, Belém, PA, Brasil.
Clarina LouisUniversidade Federal do Pará - UFPA, Belém, PA, Brasil.
Jonas IkikameUniversidade Federal do Pará - UFPA, Belém, PA, Brasil.
Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes JuniorCentro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA, Belém, PA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-9539
Universidade Federal do Pará · BRCentro Universitário do Pará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several different maneuvers have been described for obtaining access to the distal cervical segment of the internal carotid artery or to a high carotid bifurcation. However there are different approaches to systematization of these techniques. The objective of this study is to review the techniques described and propose a practical protocol to support selection of the most appropriate technique for each case. The review is based on the results of database searches on PubMed Central, the Virtual Health Library (BVSalud), and SciELO for articles on the subject published in English or Portuguese from 1980 to 2021. Among the different maneuvers described, it appears reasonable that the first two steps should be to obtain access at the sternocleidomastoid muscle, followed by section or retraction of the digastric muscle posterior belly. If needed, temporary unilateral mandibular subluxation is an additional resource that is preferable to division of the styloid apparatus process, because of its lesser potential for morbidity. Even wider exposure can be obtained using mandibular osteotomies.

Indexed as

carotid artery diseasesinternal carotid arterymandibular osteotomytemporomandibular joint

Identifiers

PMID36003126
PMCPMC9388048
OpenAlexW4290716515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.