Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36003110›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

The effectiveness of a school-based, universal mental health programme in six European countries.

Carmel Cefai, Liberato Camilleri, Paul Bartolo, Ilaria Grazzani, Valeria Cavioni, Elisabetta Conte, Veronica Ornaghi, Alessia Agliati, Sabina Gandellini, Sanja Tatalovic Vorkapic and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Carmel CefaiDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Resilience and Socio-Emotional Health, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Liberato CamilleriDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Paul BartoloDepartment of Psychology, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Ilaria Grazzani"R. Massa" Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Valeria Cavioni"R. Massa" Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta Conte"R. Massa" Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Veronica Ornaghi"R. Massa" Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Alessia Agliati"R. Massa" Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Sabina Gandellini"R. Massa" Department of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Sanja Tatalovic VorkapicFaculty of Teacher Education, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Maria PoulouDepartment of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Baiba MartinsoneDepartment of Psychology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Ieva StokenbergaDepartment of Psychology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Celeste SimõesDepartment of Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Margarida SantosDepartment of Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Aurora Adina ColomeischiFaculty of Sciences in Education, Stefan cel Mare University, Suceava, Romania.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Malta · MTUniversity of Latvia · LVUniversity of Lisbon · PTŞtefan cel Mare University of Suceava · ROUniversity of Patras · GRUniversity of Rijeka · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As children and young people today face ever increasing social, emotional and mental health challenges, schools, as one of the primary systems in children's lives, are called to broaden their agenda and help to address these challenges. This paper discusses the evaluation of a school-based, universal mental health promotion programme developed recently for the European context. The programme provides a universal curriculum from early years to high school, aiming to promote social and emotional learning and resilience and prevent social, emotional, and behavioural problems in children and adolescents. A total of 7,789 students (and their teachers and parents) from kindergarten to high school across 6 countries in Europe were recruited from 434 classrooms in 124 schools, making use of cluster sampling. A quasi-experimental longitudinal design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the programme on students' outcomes by comparing the groups' outcomes within times (pre-test vs. post-test) and between groups (experimental vs. control group). A total of 779 classroom teachers completed pre-and-post scales measuring students' social and emotional learning, mental health and academic achievement. Results indicate that the experimental group had significantly larger increase in social and emotional competence and prosocial behaviour, and a decrease in mental health issues (externalising and internalising problems). No significant impact was found for academic outcomes. The findings are discussed in view of the limitations of the study and areas for further research.

Indexed as

effectivenessmental healthPROMESHschool-based programmesocial and emotional learninguniversal intervention

Identifiers

PMID36003110
PMCPMC9393716
OpenAlexW4290615464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.