Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36003075›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2022

Clinical and microbiological evaluation of temocillin for bloodstream infections with Enterobacterales: a Belgian single-centre retrospective study.

Julie Oosterbos, Maaike Schalkwijk, Steven Thiessen, Els Oris, Guy Coppens, Katrien Lagrou, Deborah Steensels

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Temocillin: A Narrative Review of Its Clinical Reappraisal.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multicenter interlaboratory study of routine systems for the susceptibility testing of temocillin using a challenge panel of multidrug-resistant strains.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie OosterbosZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg hospital, Genk, Belgium.
Maaike SchalkwijkZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg hospital, Genk, Belgium.
Steven ThiessenZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg hospital, Genk, Belgium.
Els OrisZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg hospital, Genk, Belgium.
Guy CoppensZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg hospital, Genk, Belgium.
Katrien LagrouKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Deborah SteenselsZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg hospital, Genk, Belgium.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Expanding the use of temocillin could be an important weapon in the fight against antimicrobial resistance. However, EUCAST defined clinical breakpoints for a limited number of species and only for urinary tract infections (UTI), including urosepsis but excluding severe sepsis and septic shock. Moreover, a dosage of 2 g q8h is advised in most cases. Objectives: Evaluation of temocillin use for the treatment of bacteraemia, correlating clinical and microbiological outcomes with infection site, infection severity, temocillin dosage, Enterobacterales species and MIC. Patients and methods: All adult patients with blood cultures positive for temocillin-susceptible Enterobacterales and treated with temocillin for ≥72 h from June 2018 until June 2021 were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as resolution of infection signs, no relapse of the same infection and no antibiotic switch due to insufficient clinical improvement. The secondary outcome was microbiological success. Results: In total, 182 episodes were included [140 UTI versus 42 non-UTI, 171 Conclusions: Temocillin 2 g q12h can be successfully used for the treatment of systemic UTI. Prospective studies are needed to assess outcomes and evaluate non-inferiority compared with other broad-spectrum antibiotics in non-UTI infections, including bacteraemia.

Identifiers

PMID36003075
PMCPMC9397121
OpenAlexW4292730495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.