Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002912›Full record

ReviewGeriatrics & gerontology international2022

Diet, nutrition, and cognitive function: A narrative review of Japanese longitudinal studies.

Rei Otsuka

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rei OtsukaDepartment of Epidemiology of Aging, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, Research Institute, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6184-570X
National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology · JP

Funding

Health Science and Labor Research Grant, Japan 21GB0301Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) 22de0107002h0004Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 22H00497Research Funding for Longevity Sciences from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Japan 21-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In aging societies, the number of older people with cognitive decline and dementia is increasing. Proper nutrition is a key factor that can help in the prevention of these age-related impairments. This narrative review of longitudinal studies in Japan outlines the relationship between nutrition and the brain and focuses on Japanese nutritional epidemiologic studies. The results of Japanese cohort studies suggest that rather than a single food or nutrient, a nutritionally balanced diet that integrates a variety of foods and nutrients can contribute to the maintenance of brain function and be effective in preventing dementia. In addition, this review considers a nutritional approach to reducing the severity of cognitive decline in individuals with mild cognitive impairment and dementia, and suggests lifelong strategies for the prevention of cognitive decline. It is important that we consider the practice of eating not only as a way to obtain nutrients, but also as an important lifestyle habit to maintain our physical and mental health. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 825-831.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaAgedCognitionDietHumansJapanLongitudinal Studiescognitive dysfunctiondementiadietJapaneselifestyle

Identifiers

PMID36002912
PMCPMC9805113
OpenAlexW4293102864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.