Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002871›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2022

Community of Inquiry framework to evaluate an online obstetric and neonatal emergency simulation workshop for health professional students in India.

Nisha Khot, Mahbub Sarkar, Utkarsh Bansal, Jai Vir Singh, Pramod Pharande, Atul Malhotra, Arunaz Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nisha KhotRoyal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Mahbub SarkarMonash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Utkarsh BansalHind Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Jai Vir SinghHind Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Pramod PharandeMonash Newborn, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Atul MalhotraHind Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India. atul.malhotra@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9664-4182
Arunaz KumarHind Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

Royal Australasian College of Physicians EB Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe transitioned our obstetric neonatal emergency simulation (ONE-Sim) workshops to an online format during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we evaluated key learning acquired by undergraduate medical and nursing students attending the online ONE-Sim workshops from a low- and middle-income country (LMIC).

methodsStudent perception of online workshops was collected using electronic questionnaires. Data was analysed using thematic analysis by employing the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework.

resultsOne hundred sixty medical and nursing students who attended the online ONE-Sim workshops completed the questionnaires. There was evidence in the data to support all three aspects of the CoI framework-social, cognitive and teacher presence.

conclusionsThe use of the CoI framework helped to describe key learning from online interprofessional simulation workshops conducted for a LMIC.

Indexed as

EducationEmergencyInterprofessionalLearningONE-Sim

Identifiers

PMID36002871
PMCPMC9399987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.