Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002803›Full record

SynthesisBMC pediatrics2022

The global survival rate of graft and patient in kidney transplantation of children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mousa Ghelichi-Ghojogh, Fateme Mohammadizadeh, Fatemeh Jafari, Mouhebat Vali, Sepideh Jahanian, Masoud Mohammadi, Alireza Jafari, Rozhan Khezri, Hossein-Ali Nikbakht, Masumeh Daliri and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Mousa Ghelichi-GhojoghHealth Management and Social Development Research Center, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Fateme MohammadizadehDepartment of Epidemiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Fatemeh JafariDepartment of Epidemiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mouhebat ValiDepartment of Epidemiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Sepideh JahanianDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.
Masoud MohammadiResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Alireza JafariDepartment of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Rozhan KhezriUrmia Health center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Hossein-Ali NikbakhtSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Masumeh DaliriDepartment of Epidemiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abdolhalim RajabiHealth Management and Social Development Research Center, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran. drrajabi.a@goums.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0002-0698-8166
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRGolestan University of Medical Sciences · IRBabol University of Medical Sciences · IRGolestan University · IRGonabad University of Medical Sciences · IRMayo Clinic · USUrmia University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study is a systematic review and meta-analysis on published studies about the Global Survival Rate of Graft and Patients in the Kidney Transplantation of children.

methodsStudies that investigated the survival rate of kidney transplants published until the 30th of December 2020 were selected using a systematic search strategy in the following databases: Medline, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane. The extracted data were entered into the Excel software and STATA 16.0. The search identified 6007 study references. From the total, we excluded 1348 duplicates, 3688 reference titles and abstracts that were deemed irrelevant, and 846 references that were not original articles (i.e., letter, commentary, review) or did not meet the inclusion criteria. As such, 89 studies involving 12,330 participants were included in this meta-analysis.

resultsIn this study 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10-year survival rates of graft were estimated to be 92, 83, 74.40, 67.10, and 63.50%, respectively. Also, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10-year survival rates of patients were estimated to be 99.60, 97.30, 95.20, 74.60, and 97.90%, respectively.

conclusionsThe findings suggest differences in graft and patient survival among children with kidney transplants. Although differences in ethnic origin, incompatibility with deceased donor kidneys, and types of kidney disease are unavoidable, interventions to improve preventive and living-donor transplantation are particularly needed in minority groups. In addition, more research is needed to establish and address the contribution of medical and sociocultural barriers to preferential treatment of these groups.

Indexed as

Kidney DiseasesKidney TransplantationChildHumansLiving DonorsMinority GroupsSurvival RateGraft survivalKidney transplantationMeta-analysisPatient survival

Identifiers

PMID36002803
PMCPMC9404642
OpenAlexW4293105136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.