ArticleRadiological physics and technology2022
Development and practical evaluation of a saturation effect learning simulator for inflow magnetic resonance angiography.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quality of visualization in inflow magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) depends highly on the excitation state of the longitudinal magnetization obtained using specified imaging parameters. In addition, signal intensity changes controlled by the preparation pulse-such as inversion recovery (IR) and saturation recovery (SR)-can potentially be used as quantitative physiological values. Although having practitioners understand these relationships both qualitatively and quantitatively is important, handling clinical equipment in practical learning or experiments involves limited opportunities. The simulator corresponds to a three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo sequence and allows users to freely input multiple virtual excitation effects in space and time. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the agreement between the measured MRAs obtained in flow phantom tests and virtual MRAs simulated under similar conditions. We imaged two vascular flow phantoms on a 3.0 T MR system using three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MRA and 3D inversion recovery tissue signal suppression (IR-suppression) MRA protocols. We evaluated quantitative values for consistency between the measured and virtual MRAs images with matched spatial resolution. Then we assessed the coincidence by reformatting maximum-intensity projection images with 1 mm isotropic pixels, with it ranging from 89.6 to 92.0% and 89.1 to 92.9% for TOF MRA and IR-suppression MRA, respectively. These results may be useful as a reference index for the theoretical study of MRA images by practitioners, for complementary validation by phantom testing, or for the development of MRI-related simulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.