Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002755›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2023

The robustness of glenohumeral centering measurements in dependence of shoulder rotation and their predictive value in shoulders with rotator cuff tears.

Rainer J Egli, Emma C J Widmer, Manuel Waltenspül, Samy Bouaicha, Reto Sutter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prediction of massive rotator cuff tears classified as type B or C in the Collin classification using radiographic measurements.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rainer J EgliRadiology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. rainer.egli@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-2338
Emma C J WidmerRadiology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Manuel WaltenspülDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Samy BouaichaDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Reto SutterRadiology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDe-centering of the shoulder joint on radiographs is used as indicator for severity of rotator cuff tears and as predictor for clinical outcome after surgery. The objective of the study was to assess the effect of malrotation on glenohumeral centering on radiographs and to identify the most reliable parameter for its quantification. SUBJECTS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study (2014-2018), 249 shoulders were included: 92 with imaging-confirmed supra- and infraspinatus tears (rupture; 65.2 ± 9.9 years) and 157 without tears (control; 41.1 ± 13.0 years). On radiographs in neutral position and external rotation, we assessed three radiographic parameters to quantify glenohumeral centering: acromiohumeral distance (ACHD), craniocaudal distance of the humeral head and glenoid center (Deutsch), and scapulohumeral arch congruity (Moloney). Non-parametric statistics was performed.

resultsIn both positions, only the distance parameters ACHD (< 0.5 mm) and Deutsch (< 1 mm) were comparable in the two study groups rupture and control. Comparing the parameters between the study groups revealed only ACHD to be significantly different with a reduction of more than 2 mm in the rupture group. Among the parameters, ACHD ≤ 6 mm was the only cut-off discriminating rupture (12-21% of the shoulders with ACHD ≤ 6 mm) and control (none of the shoulders with ACHD ≤ 6 mm). Ninety percent of shoulders with ACHD ≤ 6 mm presented with a massive rotator cuff tear (defined as ≥ 67% of the greater tuberosity exposed).

conclusionGlenohumeral centering assessed by ACHD and Deutsch is not affected by rotation in shoulders with and without rotator cuff tear. An ACHD ≤ 6 mm has a positive predictive value of 90% for a massive rotator cuff tear.

Indexed as

Rotator Cuff InjuriesShoulder JointHumansRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesRotator CuffRuptureShoulderAcromiohumeral distanceGlenohumeral centeringRotator cuff tearShoulder

Identifiers

PMID36002755
PMCPMC9750900
OpenAlexW4292999057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.