Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002685›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Needs assessment for patient-centered education and outcome metrics in robotic surgery.

Hope Nicole Moore, Thais Reif de Paula, Deborah S Keller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hope Nicole MooreDepartment of Surgery, Davis Medical Center, University of California, 2335, Stockton Blvd, NAOB 6Th Floor, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. hbmoore@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5353-4095
Thais Reif de PaulaBiomedical Sciences Department, University of Houston Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
Deborah S KellerDepartment of Surgery, Davis Medical Center, University of California, 2335, Stockton Blvd, NAOB 6Th Floor, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8645-6206
University of California Davis Medical Center · USHouston Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrom clinical experience, many patients undergoing robotic assisted surgery (RAS) have a poor understanding of the technology. To ensure informed consent and appropriate expectations, a needs assessment for patient-centered education and outcome metrics in RAS is warranted. Our goal was to perform an assessment of patient understanding, comfort with robotic technology, and ability to obtain critical information from their surgeon when undergoing RAS.

methodsTwenty patients planned for RAS by three surgeons were asked to complete a six-item Likert agreement scale survey prior to signing informed consent. The study coordinator administered surveys, while the surgeon left the room. Indicator statements were crafted to reduce bias and two-way evaluated for consistency. The surgeons were additionally asked their perception of each patient's understanding and comfort with RAS. Frequency statistics and tendencies were analyzed.

resultsSurgeons strongly agreed all patients appropriately understood how RAS functioned and would ask more questions before signing consent, if needed. Patients were predominately not familiar with RAS and felt surgeons did not explain how RAS worked. There was wide variability on if patients understood how RAS worked for their treatment. Overall, patients were not completely comfortable with RAS for their care, did not understand the risks of RAS compared to other approaches, and did not feel their surgeon understood what they needed to know to make informed decisions.

conclusionsThis needs assessment demonstrated critical gaps in patient knowledge about RAS, surgeon communication skills, and the ability of surgeons to know what was important from the patient perspective. The development of RAS patient-centered education and outcome metrics could help address these gaps.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresHumansInformed ConsentNeeds AssessmentPatient-Centered CareSurveys and QuestionnairesInformed consentPatient experiencePatient related experience metrics (PREM)Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS)Robotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36002685
PMCPMC10156849
OpenAlexW4292977738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.