Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002653›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2022

CRISPR/Cas tool designs for multiplex genome editing and its applications in developing biotic and abiotic stress-resistant crop plants.

Jagmohan Singh, Dimple Sharma, Gagandeep Singh Brar, Karansher Singh Sandhu, Shabir Hussain Wani, Ruchika Kashyap, Amardeep Kour, Satnam Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jagmohan SinghDivision of Plant Pathology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, 110012, New Delhi, India.
Dimple SharmaDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, 48824, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Gagandeep Singh BrarDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, 58102, Fargo, ND, USA.
Karansher Singh SandhuDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, 99163, Pullman, WA, USA.
Shabir Hussain WaniMountain Research Center for Field Crops, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology Srinagar, Khudwani, Srinagar, Jammu, Kashmir, India.
Ruchika KashyapDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Sciences, South Dakota State University, 57007, Brookings, SD, USA.
Amardeep KourRegional Research Station, Punjab Agricultural University, 151001, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Satnam SinghRegional Research Station, Punjab Agricultural University, 151203, Faridkot, Punjab, India. satnam@pau.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5298-6954
Baba Farid University of Health Sciences · INGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INMichigan State University · USNorth Dakota State University · USPunjab Agricultural University · INSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir · INSouth Dakota State University · USWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop plants are prone to several yield-reducing biotic and abiotic stresses. The crop yield reductions due to these stresses need addressing to maintain an adequate balance between the increasing world population and food production to avoid food scarcities in the future. It is impossible to increase the area under food crops proportionately to meet the rising food demand. In such an adverse scenario overcoming the biotic and abiotic stresses through biotechnological interventions may serve as a boon to help meet the globe's food requirements. Under the current genomic era, the wide availability of genomic resources and genome editing technologies such as Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs), Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs), and Clustered-Regularly Interspaced Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR/Cas) has widened the scope of overcoming these stresses for several food crops. These techniques have made gene editing more manageable and accessible with changes at the embryo level by adding or deleting DNA sequences of the target gene(s) from the genome. The CRISPR construct consists of a single guide RNA having complementarity with the nucleotide fragments of the target gene sequence, accompanied by a protospacer adjacent motif. The target sequence in the organism's genome is then cleaved by the Cas9 endonuclease for obtaining a desired trait of interest. The current review describes the components, mechanisms, and types of CRISPR/Cas techniques and how this technology has helped to functionally characterize genes associated with various biotic and abiotic stresses in a target organism. This review also summarizes the application of CRISPR/Cas technology targeting these stresses in crops through knocking down/out of associated genes.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedStress, Physiological

Identifiers

PMID36002653
OpenAlexW4293105366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.