Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002645›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Cloud and snow detection of remote sensing images based on improved Unet3.

Meijie Yin, Peng Wang, Cui Ni, Weilong Hao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meijie YinSchool of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Shan Dong Jiao Tong University, Jinan, 250357, China.
Peng WangSchool of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Shan Dong Jiao Tong University, Jinan, 250357, China. knightwp@126.com.
Cui Ni *School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Shan Dong Jiao Tong University, Jinan, 250357, China.
Weilong Hao *School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Shan Dong Jiao Tong University, Jinan, 250357, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cloud detection is an important step in remote sensing image processing and a prerequisite for subsequent analysis and interpretation of remote sensing images. Traditional cloud detection methods are difficult to accurately detect clouds and snow with very similar features such as color and texture. In this paper, the features of cloud and snow in remote sensing images are deeply extracted, and an accurate cloud and snow detection method is proposed based on the advantages of Unet3+ network in feature fusion. Firstly, color space conversion is performed on remote sensing images, RGB images and HIS images are used as input of Unet3+ network. Resnet 50 is used to replace the Unet3+ feature extraction network to extract remote sensing image features at a deeper level, and add the Convolutional Block Attention Module in Resnet50 to improve the network's attention to cloud and snow. Finally, the weighted cross entropy loss is constructed to solve the problem of unbalanced sample number caused by high proportion of background area in the image. The results show that the proposed method has strong adaptability and moderate computation. The mPA value, mIoU value and mPrecision value can reach 92.76%, 81.74% and 86.49%, respectively. Compared with other algorithms, the proposed method can better eliminate all kinds of interference information in remote sensing images of different landforms and accurately detect cloud and snow in images.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedRemote Sensing TechnologySnowAlgorithms

Identifiers

PMID36002645
PMCPMC9402556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.