Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002632›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Algoritmically improved microwave radar monitors breathing more acurrate than sensorized belt.

Andrzej Czyżewski, Bozena Kostek, Adam Kurowski, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Beata Graff, Piotr Odya, Tomasz Śmiałkowski, Andrzej Sroczyński

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electromagnetic Imaging for Breathing Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrzej CzyżewskiDepartment of Multimedia Systems, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80‑233, Gdańsk, Poland.
Bozena KostekAudio Acoustics Department, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80‑233, Gdańsk, Poland. bokostek@audioakustyka.org.
Adam KurowskiDepartment of Multimedia Systems, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80‑233, Gdańsk, Poland.
Krzysztof NarkiewiczDepartment of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80‑210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Beata GraffDepartment of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80‑210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Piotr OdyaDepartment of Multimedia Systems, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80‑233, Gdańsk, Poland.
Tomasz ŚmiałkowskiSiled Co. Ltd, 83-011, Gdańsk, Poland.
Andrzej SroczyńskiSiled Co. Ltd, 83-011, Gdańsk, Poland.
Gdańsk University of Technology · PLGdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes a novel way to measure, process, analyze, and compare respiratory signals acquired by two types of devices: a wearable sensorized belt and a microwave radar-based sensor. Both devices provide breathing rate readouts. First, the background research is presented. Then, the underlying principles and working parameters of the microwave radar-based sensor, a contactless device for monitoring breathing, are described. The breathing rate measurement protocol is then presented, and the proposed algorithm for octave error elimination is introduced. Details are provided about the data processing phase; specifically, the management of signals acquired from two devices with different working principles and how they are resampled with a common processing sample rate. This is followed by an analysis of respiratory signals experimentally acquired by the belt and microwave radar-based sensors. The analysis outcomes were checked using Levene's test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's post hoc test. The findings show that the proposed assessment method is statistically stable. The source of variability lies in the person-triggered breathing patterns rather than the working principles of the devices used. Finally, conclusions are derived, and future work is outlined.

Indexed as

MicrowavesRadarAlgorithmsHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicRespirationRespiratory RateSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID36002632
PMCPMC9400007
OpenAlexW4293103482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.