Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002446›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Striatal dopamine dissociates methylphenidate effects on value-based versus surprise-based reversal learning.

Ruben van den Bosch, Britt Lambregts, Jessica Määttä, Lieke Hofmans, Danae Papadopetraki, Andrew Westbrook, Robbert-Jan Verkes, Jan Booij, Roshan Cools

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Methylphenidate undermines or enhances divergent creativity depending on baseline dopamine synthesis capacity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ruben van den BoschRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ruben.vandenbosch@donders.ru.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3994-8291
Britt LambregtsRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jessica MäättäDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1130-0557
Lieke HofmansDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Danae PapadopetrakiRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Andrew WestbrookCognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences Department, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-2609
Robbert-Jan VerkesRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan BooijDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roshan CoolsRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8994-5534
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLBrown University · USKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Dopamine and a Bias for Proximal Action in Cognitive EffortF32MH115600 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WESTBROOK, JOHN ANDREW · 2018 to 2020
$188k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH115600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychostimulants such as methylphenidate are widely used for their cognitive enhancing effects, but there is large variability in the direction and extent of these effects. We tested the hypothesis that methylphenidate enhances or impairs reward/punishment-based reversal learning depending on baseline striatal dopamine levels and corticostriatal gating of reward/punishment-related representations in stimulus-specific sensory cortex. Young healthy adults (N = 100) were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging during a reward/punishment reversal learning task, after intake of methylphenidate or the selective D

Indexed as

DopamineMethylphenidateAdultCorpus StriatumHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReversal LearningRewardSulpirideDopamineMethylphenidateSulpiride

Identifiers

PMID36002446
PMCPMC9402573
OpenAlexW4293103259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.