Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002348›Full record

ReviewPatient education and counseling2022

Intensifying approaches to address clinical inertia among cardiovascular disease risk factors: A narrative review.

Allison A Lewinski, Shelley A Jazowski, Karen M Goldstein, Colette Whitney, Hayden B Bosworth, Leah L Zullig

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient education and counseling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04587336 (Tailored Approaches to Reduce Distress and Improve Self-Management for Veterans With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04587336 completednot on this map

Tailored Approaches to Reduce Distress and Improve Self-Management for Veterans With Diabetes (TARDIS) - Survey & Qualitative Interview

TypeobservationalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2020 to 2025Enrolled225ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Distress, Self-Management, VeteranArmsCognitive Interview, Baseline Survey, Qualitative Interviews
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating Therapeutic Inertia in Two Telehealth Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes: Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Trial.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Trial
  2. Obesity Remission: A Missing Target in Contemporary Medicine.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vascular medicine in the 21World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Allison A LewinskiCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Attn: HSR&D COIN (558/152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Duke University School of Nursing, Box 3322 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: allison.lewinski@duke.edu.
Shelley A JazowskiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 170 Rosenau Hall, CB #7400, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599‑7400, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Durham, NC 27701, USA; Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 1200, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. Electronic address: shelley.jazowski@vumc.org.
Karen M GoldsteinCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Attn: HSR&D COIN (558/152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27701, USA. Electronic address: karen.goldstein@duke.edu.
Colette WhitneyCascades East Family Medicine Residency, Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA. Electronic address: whitneyc@ohsu.edu.
Hayden B BosworthCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Attn: HSR&D COIN (558/152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Duke University School of Nursing, Box 3322 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 170 Rosenau Hall, CB #7400, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599‑7400, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Durham, NC 27701, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 102508, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: hayden.bosworth@duke.edu.
Leah L ZulligCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Attn: HSR&D COIN (558/152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Durham, NC 27701, USA. Electronic address: leah.zullig@duke.edu.

Funding

Learning Health System training program: PROgRESS--Patient/ pRactice Outcomes and Research in Effectiveness and Systems ScienceT32HS026122 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GRIJALVA, CARLOS G, ROUMIE, CHRISTIANNE L. · 2018 to 2024
$3.5M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS026122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinical inertia, the absence of treatment initiation or intensification for patients not achieving evidence-based therapeutic goals, is a primary contributor to poor clinical outcomes. Effectively combating clinical inertia requires coordinated action on the part of multiple representatives including patients, clinicians, health systems, and the pharmaceutical industry. Despite intervention attempts by these representatives, barriers to overcoming clinical inertia in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor control remain.

methodsWe conducted a narrative literature review to identify individual-level and multifactorial interventions that have been successful in addressing clinical inertia.

resultsEffective interventions included dynamic forms of patient and clinician education, monitoring of real-time patient data to facilitate shared decision-making, or a combination of these approaches. Based on findings, we describe three possible multi-level approaches to counter clinical inertia - a collaborative approach to clinician training, use of a population health manager, and use of electronic monitoring and reminder devices.

conclusionTo reduce clinical inertia and achieve optimal CVD risk factor control, interventions should consider the role of multiple representatives, be feasible for implementation in healthcare systems, and be flexible for an individual patient's adherence needs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Representatives (e.g., patients, clinicians, health systems, and the pharmaceutical industry) could consider approaches to identify and monitor non-adherence to address clinical inertia.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCognitionEducational StatusHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMedical AssistanceCardiovascular diseaseClinical inertiaDiabetes mellitusDisease managementMedication adherenceTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID36002348
PMCPMC9675717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.