Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002201›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Usability and feasibility assessment of a smartphone application (Suhriday) for heart failure self-care remote monitoring in an Indian tertiary health care setting: a pilot mixed-methods study.

Bhuvana Kolar Bylappa, Deepak Y Kamath, Immaculate Sheela Josephine, Jabraan Shaikh, Anant Kamath, Preethi Rioniz, Shruthi Kulkarni, Kiron Varghese, Denis Xavier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bhuvana Kolar BylappaPharmacology, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India bhuvana.bvn@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7108-7524
Deepak Y KamathPharmacology, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Immaculate Sheela JosephineDivision of Clinical Research and Training, St John's Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Jabraan ShaikhCardiology, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Anant KamathNational Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Preethi RionizPharmacology, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Shruthi KulkarniMedicine, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Kiron VargheseCardiology, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Denis XavierPharmacology, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesRemote monitoring as a component of chronic heart failure (CHF) management programmes has demonstrated utility in reducing the risk of rehospitalisation and mortality. There is little evidence on mobile health app facilitated remote monitoring in India. We conducted a pilot usability and feasibility assessment of a smartphone-based application (Suhriday) to remotely monitor patients with CHF.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods design. Usability testing consisted of the think-aloud approach followed by semistructured in-depth interviews (SSIs) and a satisfaction questionnaire. Feasibility testing was done using acceptability and user satisfaction questionnaires in addition to SSIs. We trained five purposively sampled patients with CHF (based on health literacy and gender) and their caregivers (n=10) in self-care monitoring and app use. Usability was assessed using metrics such as task completion, time required for task completion and user satisfaction using Brooke's System Usability Scale (SUS). Content analysis of the transcripts with deductive coding was performed for both usability and feasibility interviews. The number and types of medical alerts transmitted through the app were captured and escalated to the treating team.

resultsCritical tasks involving (1) opening the app and identifying task list, (2) reporting blood pressure, weight, heart rate and fluid intake and (3) reporting symptoms were completed within 60 s by four patients. Median (IQR) SUS score was 85 (75-92.5) indicating high level of usability. There were 62 alerts from four patients over 4 weeks, with 36 (58.1%) excess fluid intake alerts and 16 (25.8%) blood pressure variations being the most frequent. One participant had challenges using the app and was monitored through active phone calls.

conclusionOverall usability and satisfaction with Suhriday were good and we were able to remotely manage patients. However, patients with limited health literacy and those facing technological challenges required active structured telephone support.

Indexed as

Heart FailureMobile ApplicationsTelemedicineFeasibility StudiesHumansSelf CareSmartphoneCardiologyHeart failureInformation technology

Identifiers

PMID36002201
PMCPMC9413287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.