Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36002171›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2022

The 6-min walk test as a primary end-point in interstitial lung disease.

Sergio Harari, Athol U Wells, Wim A Wuyts, Steven D Nathan, Klaus-Uwe Kirchgaessler, Monica Bengus, Jürgen Behr

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advanced interstitial lung disease: Evidence-based management and clinical approach.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Sergio HarariDept of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8629-7391
Athol U WellsInterstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Wim A WuytsUnit for Interstitial Lung Diseases, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9648-3497
Steven D NathanThe Advanced Lung Disease and Transplant Program, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Klaus-Uwe KirchgaesslerF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Monica BengusF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Jürgen BehrDept of Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany juergen.behr@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHAsklepios Fachkliniken München-Gauting · DEInova Fairfax Hospital · USKU Leuven · BERoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for clinical trial end-points to better assess how patients feel and function, so that interventions can be developed which alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life. Use of 6-min walk test (6MWT) outcomes as a primary end-point in interstitial lung disease (ILD) trials is growing, particularly for drugs targeting concurrent pulmonary hypertension. However, 6MWT outcomes may be influenced differentially by interstitial lung and pulmonary vascular components of ILD, making interpretation complicated. We propose that using 6MWT outcomes, including 6-min walk distance or oxygen desaturation, as primary end-points should depend upon the study population (how advanced the ILD is; whether vasculopathy is significant), the degree of disease progression, and, importantly, the effect of study treatment expected. We argue that the 6MWT as a single outcome measure is suitable as a primary end-point if the treatment goal is to improve functional performance or prevent disease progression within a study population of patients with advanced ILD or those with ILD and co-existent vasculopathy. In addition, we discuss the potential of composite primary end-points incorporating 6MWT outcomes, outlining important considerations to ensure that they are appropriate for the study population and treatment goals.

Indexed as

Exercise TestLung Diseases, InterstitialDisease ProgressionHumansQuality of LifeWalk Test

Identifiers

PMID36002171
PMCPMC9724818
OpenAlexW4293103097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.