Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2022
Within-Trial Cost-Effectiveness of an Adherence-Enhancing Educational Intervention for Glaucoma.
Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03052257 (Improving Glaucoma Medication Adherence), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Glaucoma Medication Adherence
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifaceted behavioral interventions to improve topical glaucoma therapy adherence in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Cost-Utility Analysis of a Medication Adherence-Enhancing Educational Intervention for Glaucoma.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaTrial
- Exploring association between ambient air pollution and glaucoma in China: a nationwide analysis with predictive modeling based on the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Factors Associated with Nonreturn after Loss to Follow-Up from Glaucoma Care: An IRIS® Registry Retrospective Analysis.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the within-trial cost-effectiveness of a behavioral intervention to improve glaucoma medication adherence.
designProspective cost-effectiveness analysis of randomized, controlled trial data.
methodsThe study setting was a Veterans Affairs (VA) eye clinic. The patient population comprised veterans with medically treated glaucoma and self-reported poor adherence. Participants were randomized to a personalized educational session with a reminder bottle to promote medication adherence or to a control session on general eye health. Costs were assessed from the perspective of the VA payor at 6 months using the VA Managerial Cost Accounting System. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted using bootstrapped samples. The main outcome measures were the proportion of participants attaining ≥80% adherence as measured by electronic monitor, total intervention and medical resource costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing intervention to control at 6 months.
resultsOf 200 randomized participants, 95 of 100 assigned to the intervention and 97 of 100 assigned to the control had adherence outcomes at 6 months, and the proportion of adherent patients was higher in the intervention group compared to control (0.78 vs 0.40, P < .0001). All participants had costs at 6 months. The total cost at 6 months was $1,149,600 in the intervention group (n = 100) compared to $1,298,700 in the control group (n = 100). Thus, in a hypothetical cohort of 100 patients, the intervention was associated with cost savings (-$149,100) and resulted in 38 additional patients achieving medication adherence.
conclusionsAn adherence-enhancing behavioral intervention was effective and cost saving at 6 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.