Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36001991›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2023

Impact of residual angina on long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft for complex coronary artery disease.

Masafumi Ono, Patrick W Serruys, Hideyuki Kawashima, Mattia Lunardi, Rutao Wang, Hironori Hara, Chao Gao, Scot Garg, Neil O'Leary, Joanna J Wykrzykowska and 10 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Visually assessed ischemia on cardiac magnetic resonance, but not quantitative perfusion metrics, predicts symptomatic improvement in coronary artery bypass.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Masafumi OnoDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3919-5648
Patrick W SerruysDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG ), Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9636-1104
Hideyuki KawashimaDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mattia LunardiDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG ), Galway, Ireland.
Rutao WangDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG ), Galway, Ireland.
Hironori HaraDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chao GaoDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG ), Galway, Ireland.
Scot GargDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK.
Neil O'LearyDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG ), Galway, Ireland.
Joanna J WykrzykowskaDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan J PiekDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David R HolmesDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Marie-Claude MoriceDépartement of Cardiologie, Hôpital privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay Générale de Santé Massy, France.
Arie Pieter KappeteinDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Thilo NoackUniversity Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Piroze M DavierwalaUniversity Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
John A SpertusDepartment of Cardiology, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute/UMKC, Kansas City, Missouri, 22 USA.
David J CohenClinical and Outcomes Research, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York NY and St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9163-724X
Yoshinobu OnumaDepartment of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG ), Galway, Ireland.
SYNTAX Extended Survival Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact on 10-year survival of patient-reported anginal status at 1 year following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and/or three-vessel CAD (3VD). METHODS AND

resultsIn this post hoc analysis of the randomized SYNTAX Extended Survival study, patients were classified as having residual angina (RA) if their self-reported Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency (SAQ-AF) scale was ≤90 at the 1-year follow-up post-revascularization with PCI or CABG. The primary endpoint of all-cause death at 10 years was compared between the RA and no-RA groups. A sensitivity analysis was performed using a 6-month SAQ-AF.At 1 year, 373 (26.1%) out of 1428 patients reported RA. Whilst RA at 1 year was an independent correlate of repeat revascularization at 5 years [18.3 vs. 11.5%; adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-2.15], it was not associated with all-cause death at 10 years (22.1 vs. 21.6%; adjusted HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.83-1.47). These results were consistent when stratified by the modality of revascularization (PCI or CABG) or by anginal frequency. The sensitivity analysis replicating the analyses based on 6-month angina status resulted in similar findings.

conclusionAmong patients with LMCAD and/or 3VD, patient-reported RA at 1 year post-revascularization was independently associated with repeat revascularization at 5 years; however, it did not significantly increase 10-year mortality, irrespective of the primary modality of revascularization or severity of RA.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionAngina PectorisCoronary Artery BypassHumansSelf Report10-year SurvivalAnginaCABGLeft-main coronary artery diseasePCIQuality of lifeRevascularizationSYNTAXThree-vessel disease

Identifiers

PMID36001991
PMCPMC10405129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.