Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36001628›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

AI-based analysis of oral lesions using novel deep convolutional neural networks for early detection of oral cancer.

Kritsasith Warin, Wasit Limprasert, Siriwan Suebnukarn, Suthin Jinaporntham, Patcharapon Jantana, Sothana Vicharueang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Application of artificial intelligence in oral potentially malignant disorders: current opinions and future barriers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kritsasith WarinFaculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1103-1411
Wasit LimprasertCollege of Interdisciplinary Studies, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Siriwan SuebnukarnFaculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1237-1274
Suthin JinapornthamFaculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Nai Muang, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Patcharapon JantanaStoreMesh, Thailand Science Park, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Sothana VicharueangStoreMesh, Thailand Science Park, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in oncology have been developed rapidly with reported successes in recent years. This work aims to evaluate the performance of deep convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms for the classification and detection of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in oral photographic images. A dataset comprising 980 oral photographic images was divided into 365 images of OSCC, 315 images of OPMDs and 300 images of non-pathological images. Multiclass image classification models were created by using DenseNet-169, ResNet-101, SqueezeNet and Swin-S. Multiclass object detection models were fabricated by using faster R-CNN, YOLOv5, RetinaNet and CenterNet2. The AUC of multiclass image classification of the best CNN models, DenseNet-196, was 1.00 and 0.98 on OSCC and OPMDs, respectively. The AUC of the best multiclass CNN-base object detection models, Faster R-CNN, was 0.88 and 0.64 on OSCC and OPMDs, respectively. In comparison, DenseNet-196 yielded the best multiclass image classification performance with AUC of 1.00 and 0.98 on OSCC and OPMD, respectively. These values were inline with the performance of experts and superior to those of general practictioners (GPs). In conclusion, CNN-based models have potential for the identification of OSCC and OPMDs in oral photographic images and are expected to be a diagnostic tool to assist GPs for the early detection of oral cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellMouth NeoplasmsOral UlcerArtificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID36001628
PMCPMC9401150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.