Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36001610›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

The perception of Hungarian food by consumer segments according to food purchasing preferences based on primary research results.

Mónika Garai-Fodor, Anett Popovics, Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mónika Garai-FodorKeleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.
Anett PopovicsKeleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ágnes Csiszárik-KocsirKeleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5454-7843
Obuda University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to the intrinsic value of the product, social, cultural and psychological factors also have a major influence on the consumer's purchasing decision. They are also influenced by trends and tendencies such as globalisation, digitalisation and various economic and social crises. In our study, we focused on the analysis of food purchasing preferences; including the reasons for the rise of ethnocentrism in the purchase of domestic products and the potential of this phenomenon in light of relevant secondary data and quantitative primary results. The main objective of the study's primary research is to demonstrate that consumer groups, distinguishable by food consumption preferences, have differentiated perceptions of domestic food (price, quality, reliability). This provides evidence that food consumer preferences are reflected in decisions about domestic food. Due to the Hungarian relevance of the topic, the presentation of related international research and literature was given a prominent role. The focus of our research was to investigate the food purchasing preferences of Hungarian food consumers. Based on the results, we were able to characterise distinct consumer segments based on food purchasing preferences, and we were able to identify potential target groups of domestic food based on food consumer preferences: the 'conscious food buyers', the 'impulse buyers' and the 'no preference'. In our view, members belonging to the first two segments can be successfully persuaded to buy Hungarian food through an educational campaign based on sufficiently fashionable and trendy motifs with the help of the right reference person.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFood PreferencesHumansHungaryPerceptionReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36001610
PMCPMC9401118
OpenAlexW4293105410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.