Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36001590›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Perception of risk regarding the use of COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant women in Motta town and Hulet Eji Enese district, northwest Ethiopia.

Melaku Hunie Asratie, Belayneh Ayanaw Kassie, Daniel Gashaneh Belay, Mastewal Endalew, Moges Gashaw, Getnet Melak Assegie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melaku Hunie AsratieDepartment of Women's and Family Health, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-2281-7519
Belayneh Ayanaw KassieDepartment of Women's and Family Health, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Daniel Gashaneh BelayDepartment of Human Anatomy, College of medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Mastewal EndalewDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Moges GashawDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-4532-1786
Getnet Melak AssegieDepartment of Economics, School of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is a common practice in developing countries like Ethiopia. Despite there being a rumor from the community that the use of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is associated with many pregnancy adverse outcomes. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence on the perception of risk COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy in Ethiopia. This study assessed the perception of risk COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and associated factors in Motta town and Hulet Eji Enese district, northwest Ethiopia.

methodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from December 12 to February 12, 2021. A total of 851 women' were selected using the stratified cluster sampling technique. Data were collected by face-to-face interview using a semi-structured pretested and interviewer-administered questionnaire. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify factors associated with the perception of risk COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval at a p-value of ≤ 0.05 was used to declare the level of significance.

resultsPerception of risk COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was 34.2% (95%CI (Confidence Interval): 31-37). Unplanned pregnancy (AOR = 3.66; 95%CI: 2.31-5.81), long travel time to the nearby health care facility (AOR: 4.57; 95% CI: 2.34-8.91), have no formal education (AOR: 3.15; 95%CI: 1.71-5.79), attending secondary educational level (AOR: 5.18; 95% CI: 2.17-12.4), no ANC (Antenatal Care) service utilization (AOR: 7.07; 95% CI: 4.35-11.5) and negative attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination (AOR: 6.05; 95%CI: 3.88-9.43) were significantly associated with the perception of risk COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.

conclusionsMost of the participants perceive COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy as a risk for the outcome of pregnancy. Designing strategies to increase women's educational status, promoting the need for maternal and child health services, and awareness creation regarding COVID-19 vaccination will have a great role in changing the perception of pregnant women. Therefore, the government should design public health programs targeting the identified factor, and should minimize the perception of risk acquiring infection from COVID-19 vaccine to improve maternal and neonatal health outcome.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesChildCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPerceptionPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnant PeoplePrenatal CareCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36001590
PMCPMC9401104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.