Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36001587›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic blood donors at two time points in Karachi.

Muhammad Hasan, Bushra Moiz, Shama Qaiser, Kiran Iqbal Masood, Zara Ghous, Areeba Hussain, Natasha Ali, J Pedro Simas, Marc Veldhoen, Paula Alves and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad HasanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Bushra MoizDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shama QaiserDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Kiran Iqbal MasoodDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zara GhousDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Areeba HussainDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Natasha AliDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
J Pedro SimasInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marc VeldhoenInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Paula AlvesIBET ITQB, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Syed Hani AbidiDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Kulsoom GhiasDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Erum KhanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zahra HasanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7580-372X
Aga Khan University · PKUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn estimated 1.5 million cases were reported in Pakistan until 23 March, 2022. However, SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing capacity has been limited and the incidence of COVID-19 infections is unknown. Volunteer healthy blood donors can be a control population for assessment of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in the population. We determined COVID-19 seroprevalence during the second pandemic wave in Karachi in donors without known infections or symptoms in 4 weeks prior to enrollment. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe enrolled 558 healthy blood donors at the Aga Khan University Hospital between December 2020 and February 2021. ABO blood groups were determined. Serum IgG reactivity were measured to spike and receptor binding domain (RBD) proteins.

resultsStudy subjects were predominantly males (99.1%) with a mean age of 29.0±7.4 years. Blood groups were represented by; B (35.8%), O (33.3%), A (23.8%) and AB (7%). Positive IgG responses to spike were detected in 53.4% (95% CI, 49.3-37.5) of blood donors. Positive IgG antibodies to RBD were present in 16.7% (95% CI; 13.6-19.8) of individuals. No significant difference was found between the frequency of IgG antibodies to spike or RBD across age groups. Frequencies of IgG to Spike and RBD antibodies between December 2020 and February 2021 were found to be similar. Seropositivity to either antigen between individuals of different blood groups did not differ. Notably, 31.2% of individuals with IgG antibodies to spike also had IgG antibodies to RBD. Amongst donors who had previously confirmed COVID-19 and were seropositive to spike, 40% had IgG to RBD.

conclusionsOur study provides insights into the seroprevalence of antibodies to COVID-19 in a healthy cohort in Karachi. The differential dynamics of IgG to spike and RBD likely represent both exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and associate with protective immunity in the population.

Indexed as

Blood Group AntigensCOVID-19AdultAntibodies, ViralBlood DonorsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralBlood Group AntigensImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36001587
PMCPMC9401161
OpenAlexW4293101378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.