ArticleAge and ageing2022
Dimensions of end-of-life preferences in the Swiss general population aged 55+.
Article in Age and ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Experiences and perspectives of older adults in nursing homes and their families participating in advance care planning: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- Personality traits and end-of-life planning in older adults: insights from a population-based survey.European journal of ageing · 2026Article
- "I Wish I Knew": Assessing Older Adults' Perceived and Actual Knowledge of Their Partners' End-of-Life Preferences.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Overestimation of Survival Rates of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Associated with Higher Preferences to Be Resuscitated: Evidence from a National Survey of Older Adults in Switzerland.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundunderstanding end-of-life preferences in the general population and how they are structured in people's minds is essential to inform how to better shape healthcare services in accordance with population expectations for their end of life and optimise communication on end-of-life care issues.
objectiveexplore key dimensions underlying end-of-life preferences in a nationally representative sample of adults aged 55 and over in Switzerland.
methodsrespondents (n = 2,514) to the Swiss version of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe assessed the importance of 23 end-of-life items on a 4-point Likert scale. The factorial structure of the underlying end-of-life preferences was examined using exploratory structural equation modelling.
resultsfour dimensions underlying end-of-life preferences were identified: a medical dimension including aspects related to pain management and the maintenance of physical and cognitive abilities; a psychosocial dimension encompassing aspects related to social and spiritual support; a control dimension addressing the need to achieve some control and to put things in order before death; and a burden dimension reflecting wishes not to be a burden to others and to feel useful to others.
conclusionhighlighting the multi-dimensionality of end-of-life preferences, our results reaffirm the importance of a holistic and comprehensive approach to the end of life. Our results also provide a general framework that may guide the development of information and awareness campaigns on end-of-life care issues in the general population, informational materials and guidelines to support healthy individuals in end-of-life thinking and planning, and advance directive templates appropriate for healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.