ArticleThe Permanente journal2022
Food Insecurity Screening in a Pediatric Clinic: Findings on Documentation and Multidimensional Care Needs.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Performance of a two-item screening for household food insecurity during WIC services.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Integrating Social Care into Healthcare: A Review on Applying the Social Determinants of Health in Clinical Settings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends routine screening and resource provision for food insecurity (FI). The authors describe documentation of FI, as well as social, developmental, and health care utilization characteristics, among patients with and without FI in a pediatric clinic. Methods This data-only case-control study describes patients with and without FI seen by pediatricians who identified at least 10 patients with FI between January 2019 and January 2020. Controls were seen by the same pediatrician on the same day, matched 2:1 with cases. Chart review identified FI documentation. Bivariate analyses were used to describe demographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics. Results The authors identified 74 patients with FI (cases) and 144 controls. Pediatricians documented FI in the medical record for 76% of patients identified with FI, although only 43% had FI in the problem list. There were no differences between cases and controls in the distribution of age or sex. A larger proportion of cases used the emergency department (25.7% vs 9.6%; p < 0.05), were Black (36.5% vs 15.3%; p < 0.05) or Hispanic (44.6% vs 18.8%; p < 0.05), utilized Medi-Cal (41.9% vs 16.7%; p < 0.05), had developmental delay (13.5% vs 4.2%; p < 0.05), received speech therapy (20.3% vs 4.9%; p < 0.05), or were referred to a social worker (37.8% vs 3.5%; p < 0.05). Discussion Our findings show inconsistent documentation of FI in medical records and that FI is associated with increased social, developmental, and health care utilization needs. Conclusion Further research is needed to assess the impact of documenting FI in patient charts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.