Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36001280›Full record

ReviewNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2023

The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement.

V J M Zeijen, A A Kroon, B H van den Born, P J Blankestijn, S C A Meijvis, A Nap, E Lipsic, A Elvan, J Versmissen, R J van Geuns and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

V J M ZeijenDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A A KroonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center & Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
B H van den BornDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P J BlankestijnDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S C A MeijvisDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A NapDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E LipsicDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
A ElvanDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Heart Center, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
J VersmissenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R J van GeunsDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
M VoskuilDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P A L ToninoDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
W SpieringDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J DeinumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J DaemenDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.daemen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-1410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the Netherlands, there are approximately 2.8 million people with hypertension. Despite treatment recommendations including lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs, most patients do not meet guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. In order to improve BP control and lower the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been introduced and studied as a non-pharmacological approach. While early data on the efficacy of RDN showed conflicting results, improvements in treatment protocols and study design resulted in robust new evidence supporting the potential of the technology to improve patient care in hypertensive subjects. Recently, 5 randomised sham-controlled trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the technology. Modelling studies have further shown that RDN is cost-effective in the Dutch healthcare setting. Given the undisputable disease burden along with the shortcomings of current therapeutic options, we postulate a new, clearly framed indication for RDN as an adjunct in the treatment of hypertension. The present consensus statement summarises current guideline-recommended BP targets, proposed workup and treatment for hypertension, and position of RDN for those patients with primary hypertension who do not meet guideline-recommended BP targets (see central illustration).

Indexed as

ConsensusHypertensionNetherlandsPatient careSympathectomy

Identifiers

PMID36001280
PMCPMC9807711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.