Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36001277›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2023

Vitamin D

Billy Huggins, Mindy Farris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Billy HugginsDepartment of Biology, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR, USA.
Mindy FarrisDepartment of Biology, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR, USA. mfarris@uca.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9559-5761
University of Central Arkansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a variety of age-related diseases and is becoming increasingly more prevalent in the population over time. Some diseases associated with deficiency are cardiovascular disease, cancer, and neurodegeneration. This association, as well as the fact that vitamin D has been demonstrated to play an important role in a variety of extraskeletal processes, has led some to claim that vitamin D is an essential longevity vitamin. However, the role of vitamin D in healthy aging has been difficult to determine. In order to study vitamin D in the context of aging, the model organism, Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), was employed. To study vitamin D's impact on aging and age-related disease, lifespan and health span were measured across three different genetic strains of C. elegans. Strains investigated were wildtype (N2), worms with a mutant vitamin D receptor ortholog (nhr-8), and worms engineered to represent Alzheimer disease (gnals2). Bioinformatic analysis of available public data was also performed in order to identify the transcriptional response produced in N2 worms treated with vitamin D

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsAnimalsCholecalciferolLongevityMutationVitamin DCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCholecalciferolVitamin DAlzheimer diseaseC. elegansExtensionLifespanLongevityNHR-8Vitamin D

Identifiers

PMID36001277
PMCPMC9886739
OpenAlexW4293013399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.