ReviewAmbio2023
Integrating justice in Nature-Based Solutions to avoid nature-enabled dispossession.
Review in Ambio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Community-led landscape regeneration: A review of and framework for engagement in restoration initiatives.Ambio · 2026Pooled it
- From past, persisting, and consolidating ecologies of segregation to ecologies of repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Review
- Conservation and environmental management reimagined: Toward anti-oppressive futures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- What is the nature of evidence regarding relationships between urban agriculture and gentrification? A systematic map protocol.Environmental evidence · 2025Article
- Policy principles for sustainable and just land systems.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Inter- and transdisciplinary knowledge is critical for nature-based solutions to contribute to just urban transformations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Market-based instruments to fund nature-based solutions for flood risk management can disproportionately benefit affluent areas.Communications earth & environment · 2025Article
- Realizing multispecies justice through a capability approach to promote nature-based solutions.npj urban sustainability · 2025Article
- Climate and health: a path to strategic co-financing?Health policy and planning · 2024Review
- Article
- Is the coastal future green, grey or hybrid? Diverse perspectives on coastal flood risk management and adaptation in the UK.Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures · 2024Article
- Awakening the sleeping giant of urban green in times of crisis-coverage, co-creation and practical guidelines for optimizing biodiversity-friendly and health-promoting residential greenery.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heavily featured over the last few years in global research and policy agreements, Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) remain however exposed to much debate over the ways their current design and ability to achieve both environmental goals and social needs. As they become mainstream climate mitigation and adaptation options, their capacity to deliver expected benefits, especially when contemplating equity and justice, is at least uncertain. Through a critical review of existing debates and perspectives on NBS, this paper questions their uptake and points at the frequent embeddedness of NBS in speculative and elite-based development paths in both urban and rural areas. We present an alternative, justice-oriented approach to NBS so that projects can avoid nature-enable dispossession and instead build nature-inspired justice that prioritizes the needs, identities, and livelihoods of the most ecologically and socially vulnerable residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.