Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36001243›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2023

ClearSpeechTogether: a Rater Blinded, Single, Controlled Feasibility Study of Speech Intervention for People with Progressive Ataxia.

Anja Lowit, Jessica Cox, Melissa Loucas, Jennifer Grassly, Aisling Egan, Frits van Brenk, Marios Hadjivassiliou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Anja LowitSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, Strathclyde University, 40 George St, Glasgow, G1 1QE, Scotland. a.lowit@strath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0842-584X
Jessica CoxSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, Strathclyde University, 40 George St, Glasgow, G1 1QE, Scotland.
Melissa LoucasSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, Earley Gate, University of Reading, RG6 6AL, Reading, England.
Jennifer GrasslyUniversity College London, Chandler House, 2 Wakefield Street, London, WC1N 1PF, England.
Aisling EganSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, Strathclyde University, 40 George St, Glasgow, G1 1QE, Scotland.
Frits van BrenkDepartment of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marios HadjivassiliouSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Rd, Sheffield, S10 2JF, England.
University of Strathclyde · GBLanguage Science (South Korea) · KRRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Ataxia UK ZSTRATHC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProgressive ataxias frequently lead to speech disorders and consequently impact on communication participation and psychosocial wellbeing. Whilst recent studies demonstrate the potential for improvements in these areas, these treatments generally require intensive input which can reduce acceptability of the approach. A new model of care-ClearSpeechTogether-is proposed which maximises treatment intensity whilst minimising demands on clinician. This study aimed to establish feasibility and accessibility of this approach and at the same time determine the potential benefits and adverse effects on people with progressive ataxias.

methodThis feasibility study targeted people with progressive ataxia and mild-moderate speech and gross motor impairment. ClearSpeechTogether consisted of four individual sessions over 2 weeks followed by 20 patient-led group sessions over 4 weeks. All sessions were provided online. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected for evaluation.

resultsNine participants completed treatment. Feasibility and acceptability were high and no adverse effects were reported. Statistical tests found significantly reduced vocal strain, improved reading intelligibility and increased participation and confidence. Participant interviews highlighted the value of group support internalisation of speech strategies and psycho-social wellbeing. DISCUSSION: ClearSpeechTogether presented a feasible, acceptable intervention for a small cohort of people with progressive ataxia. It matched or exceeded the outcomes previously reported following individual therapy. Particularly notable was the fact that this could be achieved through patient led practice without the presence of a clinician. Pending confirmation of our results by larger, controlled trials, ClearSpeechTogether could represent an effective approach to manage speech problems in ataxia.

Indexed as

SpeechSpinocerebellar DegenerationsAtaxiaFeasibility StudiesHumansSpeech DisordersCommunication participationDysarthriaGroup interventionIntelligibilityProgressive ataxiaSpeech therapy

Identifiers

PMID36001243
PMCPMC9399979
OpenAlexW4292961036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.