Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36001179›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

A review of the content and psychometric properties of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) measures used to assess fatigue in intervention studies.

Rachel Campbell, Renée Bultijnck, Gemma Ingham, Chindhu Shunmuga Sundaram, Joshua F Wiley, Jasmine Yee, Haryana M Dhillon, Joanne Shaw

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Constructing a picture of fatigue in the context of cancer: assessment of construct overlap in common fatigue scales.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The definitions, assessment, and dimensions of cancer-related fatigue: A scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel CampbellUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, Australia. r.campbell@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5013-8361
Renée BultijnckUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4122-2323
Gemma InghamPalliative Care Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4503-0249
Chindhu Shunmuga SundaramUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9638-8219
Joshua F WileyMonash University, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0271-6702
Jasmine YeeUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9058-8212
Haryana M DhillonUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4039-5169
Joanne ShawUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-7066
The University of Sydney · AUMonash University · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and debilitating consequence of cancer and its treatment. Numerous supportive care interventions have been developed to alleviate CRF; however, the diversity of outcome measures used to assess CRF limits comparability of findings. We aimed to evaluate the content and psychometric properties of measures used to assess CRF in interventions targeting fatigue, to inform the selection of suitable measures in future research.

methodsIncluded measures were identified from a systematic review of interventions targeting CRF. General characteristics of each measure were extracted, and item content was assessed against domains specified by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) definition of CRF. Psychometric properties were evaluated against COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of heath Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria.

resultsOf 54 measures identified, 25 met inclusion criteria. Seventeen were fatigue-specific and eight a fatigue subscale or single item within a broader measure. Only 14 (56%) were specifically developed for cancer populations. Content coverage according to the NCCN CRF definition ranged from 0 to 75%. Evidence for fulfilment of COSMIN criteria in cancer populations ranged from 0 to 93%, with only five measures meeting > 70% of the COSMIN criteria.

conclusionThe Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised had good content coverage, but did not comprehensively address COSMIN criteria. The EORTC-FA12 and FACIT/FACT-F had excellent psychometric properties, with each capturing different aspects of fatigue. Ultimately, the choice of CRF measure should be guided by the research question and the CRF domains most relevant to the particular research context.

Indexed as

FatigueNeoplasmsConsensusData CollectionHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsCancer-related fatigueCOSMINMeasurementPatient-reported outcome measuresPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID36001179
PMCPMC9633540
OpenAlexW4292858696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.