Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36001005›Full record

Observational studyClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Novel Predictor of Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Tian-Ding Liu, Ying-Ying Zheng, Jun-Nan Tang, Wei Wang, Xin-Ya Dai, Jian-Chao Zhang, Qian-Qian Guo, Meng-Die Cheng, Feng-Hua Song, Lei Fan and 7 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tian-Ding LiuDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ying-Ying ZhengDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jun-Nan TangDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wei WangHenan Medical Association, Zhengzhou, China.
Xin-Ya DaiDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jian-Chao ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Qian-Qian GuoDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Meng-Die ChengDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Feng-Hua SongDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6006-4928
Lei FanDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhi-Yu LiuDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zeng-Lei ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yan BaiDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiao-Ting YueDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ru-Jie ZhengDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jin-Ying ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) has been reported to be correlated with long-term outcomes after gastrointestinal tumor surgery. However, to our knowledge, only a few studies have shown that the PNI is related to cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, we aimed to assess the association between the PNI and long-term outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

methodsThis was retrospective observational study. A total of 3561 patients with CAD after PCI were retrospectively enrolled in the CORFCHD-ZZ study from January 2013 to December 2017. The patients (3519) were divided into three groups according to PNI tertiles: the first tertile (PNI < 47.12, n = 1173), the second tertile (47.12 ≤ PNI < 51.50, n = 1185), and the third tertile (PNI ≥ 51.50, n = 1161). The mean follow-up time was 37.59 ± 22.24 months. The primary endpoint long-term mortality, including all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM).Secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).

resultIn our study, the incidences of ACM in the first, second, and third tertiles were 3.8%, 1.8% and 1.4%, respectively (

conclusionOur finding shown that PNI is an independent predictor in CAD patients after PCI,the higher the PNI, the less occurring adverse event. Therefore,PNI may be an new biomarker to predict long-term outcome of CAD patients after PCI.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionHumansNutrition AssessmentPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcomecoronary artery diseasederived prognostic nutritional indexlong-term prognosismortalitypercutaneous coronary interventionprognostic nutritional index

Identifiers

PMID36001005
PMCPMC9421060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.