Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36000873›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

Single-cell mutation calling and phylogenetic tree reconstruction with loss and recurrence.

Jack Kuipers, Jochen Singer, Niko Beerenwinkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Somatic variant calling from single-cell DNA sequencing data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack KuipersDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel 4058, Switzerland.
Jochen SingerDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel 4058, Switzerland.
Niko BeerenwinkelDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel 4058, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0573-6119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationTumours evolve as heterogeneous populations of cells, which may be distinguished by different genomic aberrations. The resulting intra-tumour heterogeneity plays an important role in cancer patient relapse and treatment failure, so that obtaining a clear understanding of each patient's tumour composition and evolutionary history is key for personalized therapies. Single-cell sequencing (SCS) now provides the possibility to resolve tumour heterogeneity at the highest resolution of individual tumour cells, but brings with it challenges related to the particular noise profiles of the sequencing protocols as well as the complexity of the underlying evolutionary process.

resultsBy modelling the noise processes and allowing mutations to be lost or to reoccur during tumour evolution, we present a method to jointly call mutations in each cell, reconstruct the phylogenetic relationship between cells, and determine the locations of mutational losses and recurrences. Our Bayesian approach allows us to accurately call mutations as well as to quantify our certainty in such predictions. We show the advantages of allowing mutational loss or recurrence with simulated data and present its application to tumour SCS data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SCIΦN is available at https://github.com/cbg-ethz/SCIPhIN. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

GenomicsNeoplasmsBayes TheoremHumansMutationPhylogenySoftware

Identifiers

PMID36000873
PMCPMC9563700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.