Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36000716›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society2022

National clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease: 2021 recommendations from the Danish Surgical Society.

Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh, Dorthe Wiinholdt Christensen, Caroline Ewertsen, Hans Friis-Andersen, Frederik Helgstrand, Lars Nannestad Jørgensen, Anders Kirkegaard-Klitbo, Anders Christian Larsen, Jonas Sanberg Ljungdalh, Palle Nordblad Schmidt and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Mønsted ShabanzadehBispebjerg Hospital Digestive Disease Center Bispebjerg Bakke 23 DK-2400 Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9415-3443
Dorthe Wiinholdt ChristensenDigestive Disease Center, Surgical Section, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Caroline EwertsenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans Friis-AndersenDepartment of Surgery, Regionshospitalet Horsens, Horsens, DenmarkInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Frederik HelgstrandDepartment of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Lars Nannestad JørgensenDigestive Disease Center, Surgical Section, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, DenmarkInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders Kirkegaard-KlitboDigestive Disease Center, Surgical Section, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders Christian LarsenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jonas Sanberg LjungdalhDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Palle Nordblad SchmidtDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rikke TherkildsenDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Peter VilmannInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Surgery, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Jes Sefland VogtDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lars Tue SørensenDigestive Disease Center, Surgical Section, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, DenmarkInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bispebjerg Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKRegional Hospital Horsens · DKRigshospitalet · DKZealand University Hospital Køge · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveGallstones are highly prevalent, and more than 9000 cholecystectomies are performed annually in Denmark. The aim of this guideline was to improve the clinical course of patients with gallstone disease including a subgroup of high-risk patients. Outcomes included reduction of complications, readmissions, and need for additional interventions in patients with uncomplicated gallstone disease, acute cholecystitis, and common bile duct stones (CBDS).

methodsAn interdisciplinary group of clinicians developed the guideline according to the GRADE methodology. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were primarily included. Non-RCTs were included if RCTs could not answer the clinical questions. Recommendations were strong or weak depending on effect estimates, quality of evidence, and patient preferences.

resultsFor patients with acute cholecystitis, acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recommended (16 RCTs, strong recommendation). Gallbladder drainage may be used as an interval procedure before a delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with temporary contraindications to surgery and severe acute cholecystitis (1 RCT and 1 non-RCT, weak recommendation). High-risk patients are suggested to undergo acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy instead of drainage (1 RCT and 1 non-RCT, weak recommendation). For patients with CBDS, a one-step procedure with simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and CBDS removal by laparoscopy or endoscopy is recommended (22 RCTs, strong recommendation). In high-risk patients with CBDS, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is suggested to be included in the treatment (6 RCTs, weak recommendation). For diagnosis of CBDS, the use of magnetic resonance imaging or endoscopic ultrasound prior to surgical treatment is recommended (8 RCTs, strong recommendation). For patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease, observation is suggested as an alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (2 RCTs, weak recommendation).

conclusionsSeven recommendations, four weak and three strong, for treating patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were developed. Studies for treatment of high-risk patients are few and more are needed. ENDORSEMENT: The Danish Surgical Society.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteGallstonesCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholecystectomyDenmarkHumanscholecystolithiasischoledocholithiasisCholelithiasisguidelinemeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36000716
OpenAlexW4293177141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.