Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36000618›Full record

ArticleRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2022

Natural vertical cotransmission of Dengue virus and Chikungunya virus from Aedes aegypti in Brumado, Bahia, Brazil.

Henry Paul Granger Neto, Cínthya Viana Souza Rocha, Thiago Macêdo Lopes Correia, Natalia Maria Pereira da Silva, Bárbara Aparecida Chaves, Nágila Francinete Costa Secundino, Paulo Filemon Paolucci Pimenta, Fabrício Freire de Melo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henry Paul Granger NetoUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4889-8732
Cínthya Viana Souza RochaUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-8543
Thiago Macêdo Lopes CorreiaUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1654-614X
Natalia Maria Pereira da SilvaUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4937-464X
Bárbara Aparecida ChavesFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Diretoria de Ensino e Pesquisa, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2079-6096
Nágila Francinete Costa SecundinoFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Diretoria de Ensino e Pesquisa, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6773-0804
Paulo Filemon Paolucci PimentaFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Diretoria de Ensino e Pesquisa, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-2482
Fabrício Freire de MeloUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5680-2753
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRFundação de Medicina Tropical · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArthropod-borne viruses have recently emerged and are pathogens of various human diseases, including dengue, zika, and chikungunya viruses.

methodsWe collectedAedes aegyptilarvae (N = 20) from Brumado, Bahia, Brazil, and treated and individually preserved the specimens. We analyzed the samples for dengue, zika, and chikungunya viruses using molecular biology methods.

resultsWe found that 25% (N = 5) and 15% (N = 3) were positive exclusively for dengue and chikungunya viruses, respectively; 15% (N = 3) were coinfected with both.

conclusionsThis is the first report of dengue and chikungunya virus coinfection in A. aegypti larvae.

Indexed as

AedesChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusDengueDengue VirusZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAnimalsBrazilHumansMosquito Vectors

Identifiers

PMID36000618
PMCPMC9413630
OpenAlexW4293041359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.