ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Impact of autocalibration method on accelerated EPI of the cervical spinal cord at 7 T.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Research for the Use of 7 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Spinal Pathologies: a Scoping Review.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Review
- Thermal stimulus task fMRI in the cervical spinal cord at 7 Tesla.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Impact of autocalibration method on accelerated EPI of the cervical spinal cord at 7 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe spinal cord contains sensorimotor neural circuits of scientific and clinical interest. However, spinal cord functional MRI (fMRI) is significantly more technically demanding than brain fMRI, due primarily to its proximity to the lungs. Accelerated echo-planar imaging (EPI) at 7 T is particularly vulnerable to k-space phase inconsistencies induced by motion or B
methodsWe compared 24-line single-shot EPI with 48-line two-shot segmented EPI, two-shot FLEET, and gradient echo (GRE)-based ACS acquisition methods, performed under various physiological conditions, in terms of temporal signal-to-noise ratio and prevalence of artifacts in generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA)-accelerated EPI of the cervical spinal cord at 7 T.
resultsSegmented EPI and FLEET ACS produce images with nearly identical patterns of severe image artifacts. GRE and single-shot EPI ACS consistently produce images free from significant artifacts, and temporal signal-to-noise ratio is significantly greater for GRE ACS, particularly in lower slices where through-slice dephasing is most severe.
conclusionsGRE and single-shot EPI-ACS acquisition methods, which are robust to respiration-induced phase errors between k-space segments, produce images with fewer and less severe artifacts than either FLEET or conventionally segmented EPI for accelerated EPI of the cervical spinal cord at 7 T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.