ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Association of Systemic Vascular Resistance Analog and Cardiovascular Outcomes: The Heart and Soul Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac cost of occupational stress among obstetricians: a cross-sectional non-invasive haemodynamic study in a tertiary hospital.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Impact of moderate to vigorous physical activity on systemic vascular resistance in Danish adults with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.Journal of human hypertension · 2025Article
- Contemporary clinical role of echocardiography in patients with advanced heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- New perspectives in the echocardiographic hemodynamics multiparametric assessment of patients with heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Non-invasively assessed haemodynamics in patients with high flow arteriovenous fistula and high output cardiac failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Systemic vascular resistance predicts high-output cardiac failure in patients with high-flow arteriovenous fistula.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- The prognostic value of systemic vascular resistance in heart failure patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study.Heart and vessels · 2023Article
- The Relationship between Resistant Hypertension and Advanced Glycation End-Product Levels Measured Using the Skin Autofluorescence Method: A Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) is an integral component of the hemodynamic profile. Previous studies have demonstrated a close correlation between an estimated SVR analog (eSVR) based on echocardiographic methods and SVR by direct hemodynamic measurement. However, the prognostic impact of eSVR remains unestablished. Methods and Results Study participants with established coronary artery disease from the Heart and Soul Study formed this study cohort. We defined Doppler-derived eSVR as the ratio of systolic blood pressure to left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral. Study participants were separated based on baseline eSVR tertile: <5.6, 5.6 to <6.9, and ≧6.9. An elevated eSVR was defined as an eSVR in the third tertile (≧6.9). Follow-up eSVR was calculated at the fifth year of checkup. Cardiovascular outcomes included heart failure, major cardiovascular events, and all-cause death. Among the 984 participants (67±11 years old, 82% men), subjects with the highest baseline eSVR tertile were the oldest, with the highest systolic blood pressure and lowest left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral. A higher eSVR was associated with increased risk of heart failure, major cardiovascular events, and death. The hazard ratio for major cardiovascular events was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.02-1.86,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.