Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36000335›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2022

Esophageal cancer: Outcome and potential benefit of esophagectomy in elderly patients.

Adeline Laurent, Raphael Marechal, Eleonora Farinella, Fikri Bouazza, Yassine Charaf, France Gay, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Kimberly Gonsette, Issam El Nakadi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical impact of diarrhea during enteral feeding after esophagectomy.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adeline LaurentDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine (ULB), Erasme University Hospital Center, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5213-9539
Raphael MarechalDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Center of Tivoli, La louvière, Belgium.
Eleonora FarinellaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine (ULB), Erasme University Hospital Center, Brussels, Belgium.
Fikri BouazzaDepartment of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine (ULB), Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
Yassine CharafDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine (ULB), Erasme University Hospital Center, Brussels, Belgium.
France GayDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Faculty of Medicine (ULB), Erasme University Hospital Center, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Luc Van LaethemDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Faculty of Medicine (ULB), Erasme University Hospital Center, Brussels, Belgium.
Kimberly GonsetteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine (ULB), Erasme University Hospital Center, Brussels, Belgium.
Issam El NakadiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine (ULB), Erasme University Hospital Center, Brussels, Belgium.
Erasmus Hospital · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tivoli · BEInstitut Jules Bordet · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis analysis evaluated the morbimortality and the potential benefit of esophagectomy for cancer in elderly patients.

methodsPatients who underwent esophagectomy for EC were divided into elderly (≥70 years) and nonelderly (<70 years) groups. The groups were compared regarding patient and tumor characteristics, postoperative morbimortality, and disease-free, overall and cancer-specific survival.

resultsSixty-one patients were classified into elderly, and 187 into nonelderly groups. The elderly were characterized by a higher rate of WHO score (p < 0.0001), higher cardiac (p < 0.004) and renal (p < 0.023) comorbidities. The rate of neoadjuvant therapy and especially of neoadjuvant CRT was significantly lower in elderly patients (p < 0.018 and p < 0.007). Operative morbidity was also higher in this group (p < 0.024). The 30- and 90-day mortality was 8.2 and 11.5%, respectively in elderly patients and 0.5 and 3.2% in nonelderly patients (p < 0.004 and p < 0.012). This 90-day mortality decreased when specific surgery-related deaths were taken into consideration. OS and DFS were significantly better in the nonelderly group (p < 0.003 and p < 0.005) while no difference was observed for cancer-specific survival (CSS).

conclusionNo difference in CSS was observed. Although elderly patients with EC had higher postoperative morbimortality, the age should not be a criterion whether to perform, or not to perform, esophagectomy. This decision must be based on the balance between the patient's general condition and aggressive disease.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsAgedDisease-Free SurvivalEsophagectomyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeelderlyesophageal canceresophagectomyoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID36000335
PMCPMC9527164
OpenAlexW4293213595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.