ArticleCureus2022
Racial and Ethnic Inequality in Survival Outcomes of Women With Triple Negative Breast Cancer.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Racial disparities in outcomes of patients with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: a post-hoc analysis of the E5103 randomized trial.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Trial
- Machine learning-based prognostic model for triple-negative breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic delays, treatment timeliness, and patient experiences in triple-negative breast cancer: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- A comparative analysis of clinicopathological features and survival between pre and postmenopausal breast cancer from an Indian cohort.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most lethal group of breast cancers. Socioeconomic factors may contribute to differences in survival rates. This study aims to identify racial/ethnic disparities in five-year survival rates among women affected by TNBC in the United States. Methods This retrospective study analyzed data from the 2010-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. Patients with a primary malignancy of triple-negative breast cancer were included in this study. Cancer-specific survival was measured at five years post-diagnosis. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results From 2010-2016, there were 26,963 women with a primary diagnosis of TNBC. After adjustment for age, insurance, marital status, stage, and surgery type, Hispanic women had the highest hazard of death when compared to White women (adjusted (adj) HR, 1.14, p<0.001). Further, non-Hispanic Black women also had a lower survival probability when compared to White women (adj HR, 1.06, p=0.002). Conclusion This study reveals that Hispanic women had the highest hazard of death when compared to White women. As TNBC is the most fatal breast cancer, future studies should investigate socioeconomic factors that may worsen prognosis of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.