Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36000091›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

Characteristics and predictors of venous thrombosis recurrence in patients with cancer and catheter-related thrombosis.

Demis N Lipe, Aiham Qdaisat, Eva Rajha, Aisha Al-Breiki, Maria T Cruz Carreras, Patrick Chaftari, Sai-Ching J Yeung, Terry W Rice

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Catheter and Non-Catheter-Related Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: Survival, Anticoagulation Efficacy, and Safety.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Demis N LipeDepartment of Emergency Medicine The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2037-3085
Aiham QdaisatDepartment of Emergency Medicine The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-8461
Eva RajhaDepartment of Emergency Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6401-5541
Aisha Al-BreikiDepartment of Emergency Medicine Sultan Qaboos University Hospital Muscat Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6150-2475
Maria T Cruz CarrerasDepartment of Emergency Medicine The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-5322
Patrick ChaftariDepartment of Emergency Medicine The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5914-6712
Sai-Ching J YeungDepartment of Emergency Medicine The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5170-0822
Terry W RiceThe Sydenham Clinic Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8149-4916
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USMenninger Clinic · USSultan Qaboos University Hospital · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Central venous catheters raise the risk of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in patients with cancer, typically affecting the upper extremity. Management of CRT involves catheter removal and anticoagulation. However, robust evidence is lacking on the optimal timing of anticoagulation relative to catheter removal. Objectives: Our goal is to provide a better understanding of the factors that increase the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in these patients. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients with cancer in our hospital affected by CRT between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017. We measured recurrence of VTE as thrombosis in any vascular bed or pulmonary embolism, for up to 2 years after diagnosis. Logistic and competing risk regression analyses were used to determine the association between different clinical factors and any VTE recurrence in patients with cancer and CRT. Results: Of the 257 individuals meeting the inclusion criteria, 80.2% had their catheter removed; of these, 50.5% did not receive anticoagulation before the removal. Patients who did not receive anticoagulation before the removal had increased 3-month and 1-year risks of recurrent VTE (odds ratio, 5.07 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-23.18]; and hazard ratio, 3.47 [95% CI, 1.34-9.01]), respectively. Conclusions: Our study supports the use of anticoagulants before catheter removal in patients with CRT. Randomized clinical trials are recommended to establish stronger evidence pertaining to the long-term risk of VTE recurrence and the effect of catheter reinsertion.

Indexed as

cancercatheteremergency departmentthrombosisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID36000091
PMCPMC9391569
OpenAlexW4292397411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.