ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022
Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis: The current state of knowledge.
Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Review
- Navigating challenges in management of difficult-to-treat chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the greater Gulf.Saudi medical journal · 2025Article
- Hops bitter β-acids have antibacterial effects against sinonasal Staphylococcus aureus but also induce sinonasal cilia and mitochondrial dysfunction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2025Article
- A cost utility analysis for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2025Article
- The rs6967330 minor allele in CDHR3 is a significant risk factor for severe acute exacerbations in chronic rhinosinusitis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Article
- Isolated abducens nerve palsy following upper respiratory infection in a patient with ipsilateral chronic sphenoid sinusitis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Severe Rhinosinusitis Complicated with Cavernous Sinus Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Advanced pharmacy practice of a doctor of pharmacy student at an allied surgical ward in a hospital in Africa.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Article
- Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis: The current state of knowledge.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Review
- Acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: clinical and microbiological perspectives from a Saudi tertiary care center.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are distinct from baseline symptomatology related to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In this review, we seek to examine the literature on AECRS to synthesize the definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and impact of AECRS on CRS patients. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review of the scientific literature, identified by searching PubMed from inception through April 2022, was performed. Results: AECRS is defined in consensus guidelines as a worsening of chronic sinus disease symptomatology, with a return to baseline, typically after intervention with systemic antibiotics and/or corticosteroids. The working definition used across the literature, however, is broad and heterogeneous. The pathophysiology of AECRS is incompletely understood but is hypothesized to include an interplay of environmental and patient-specific factors. AECRS have been found to have a negative impact on quality-of-life measures, independent of baseline CRS symptomatology, and impact how patients and physicians view overall disease control. Treatment for AECRS includes oral antibiotics and systemic corticosteroids, although their efficacy for AECRS is unclear. Appropriate use of medical and surgical treatment for CRS can reduce the frequency of AECRS. Conclusions: AECRS are a distinct entity in CRS patients and should be independently assessed when evaluating patients for CRS control. The efficacy of systemic medication usage for AECRS is currently unclear, but appropriate medical management of baseline CRS can reduce the frequency of AECRS. More research is needed to further understand this phenomenon, including a more precise and prospective definition, defined epidemiology, and how to appropriately treat. Level of Evidence: 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.