Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999944›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2023

The Effect of the Fidget Cube on Classroom Behavior among Students with Perceived Attention Difficulties.

Kelsi E Croley, Daniel D Drevon, Dawn M Decker, Michael D Hixson, Keith C Radley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelsi E CroleyMt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University.
Daniel D DrevonMt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University.ORCID 0000-0002-4750-4498
Dawn M DeckerMt Pleasant, MI USA Department of Counseling & Special Education, Central Michigan University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9815-6913
Michael D HixsonMt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University.
Keith C RadleySalt Lake City, UT USA Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6155-9666
Central Michigan University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fidget toys, one class of sensory-based interventions, enjoy favorable coverage in popular media outlets supporting their impact on attention, memory, and stress. However, there is minimal data supporting their use in the classroom. The present study used an ABAB withdrawal design to investigate the impact of noncontingent access to a commercially available fidget toy, the Fidget Cube, on academically engaged behavior, off-task behavior, Fidget Cube engagement, math problems attempted, and math problems completed accurately during independent seatwork. Participants were three 3rd-graders referred for having attention difficulties. Results indicated that noncontingent access to the Fidget Cube during independent seatwork did not improve study outcomes. Participants engaged with the Fidget Cube less in the second intervention phase than the first. Results suggest school personnel should consider alternative strategies for students with perceived attention difficulties. Limitations of the study are discussed, along with future directions for research.

Indexed as

academically engaged behavioracademic productivityfidget toyssensory-based interventions

Identifiers

PMID35999944
PMCPMC9388206
OpenAlexW4293275227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.