Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999898›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2021

Recommendations for connecting molecular sequence and biodiversity research infrastructures through ELIXIR.

Robert M Waterhouse, Anne-Françoise Adam-Blondon, Donat Agosti, Petr Baldrian, Bachir Balech, Erwan Corre, Robert P Davey, Henrik Lantz, Graziano Pesole, Christian Quast and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Robert M WaterhouseDepartment of Ecology and Evolution and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, 1015, Switzerland.
Anne-Françoise Adam-BlondonUniversité Paris Saclay, Versailles, 78026, France.
Donat AgostiPlazi, Bern, 3007, Switzerland.
Petr BaldrianInstitute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha, 142 20, Czech Republic.
Bachir BalechInstitute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, CNR, Bari, 70126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4419-0729
Erwan CorreCNRS/Sorbonne Université, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Roscoff, 29680, France.
Robert P DaveyEarlham Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5589-7754
Henrik LantzDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology/NBIS, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2419-0075
Graziano PesoleInstitute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, CNR, Bari, 70126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3663-0859
Christian QuastLife Sciences & Chemistry, Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen, Germany.
Frank Oliver GlöcknerMARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremerhaven, 27570, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8528-9023
Niels RaesNLBIF - Netherlands Biodiversity Information Facility, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, 2300 RA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4329-4892
Anna SandionigiUniversity of Milan Bicocca, Milan, 20127, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5257-0027
Monica SantamariaInstitute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, CNR, Bari, 70126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5257-0027
Wouter AddinkDiSSCo - Distributed System of Scientific Collections, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, 2300 RA, The Netherlands.
Jiri VohradskyLaboratory of Bioinformatics, Institute of Microbiology, Prague, 142 20, Czech Republic.
Amandine Nunes-JorgeLife Sciences & Chemistry, Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0007-0653
Nils Peder WillassenDept. of Chemistry, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Jerry LanfearELIXIR Hub, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8007-5568
Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies · ITConstructor University · DENaturalis Biodiversity Center · NLAlfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCzech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZEarlham Institute · GBSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUppsala University · SE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/CCG1720/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/CSP1720/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P016855/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR9783Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR9814Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR9817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Threats to global biodiversity are increasingly recognised by scientists and the public as a critical challenge. Molecular sequencing technologies offer means to catalogue, explore, and monitor the richness and biogeography of life on Earth. However, exploiting their full potential requires tools that connect biodiversity infrastructures and resources. As a research infrastructure developing services and technical solutions that help integrate and coordinate life science resources across Europe, ELIXIR is a key player. To identify opportunities, highlight priorities, and aid strategic thinking, here we survey approaches by which molecular technologies help inform understanding of biodiversity. We detail example use cases to highlight how DNA sequencing is: resolving taxonomic issues; Increasing knowledge of marine biodiversity; helping understand how agriculture and biodiversity are critically linked; and playing an essential role in ecological studies. Together with examples of national biodiversity programmes, the use cases show where progress is being made but also highlight common challenges and opportunities for future enhancement of underlying technologies and services that connect molecular and wider biodiversity domains. Based on emerging themes, we propose key recommendations to guide future funding for biodiversity research: biodiversity and bioinformatic infrastructures need to collaborate closely and strategically; taxonomic efforts need to be aligned and harmonised across domains; metadata needs to be standardised and common data management approaches widely adopted; current approaches need to be scaled up dramatically to address the anticipated explosion of molecular data; bioinformatics support for biodiversity research needs to be enabled and sustained; training for end users of biodiversity research infrastructures needs to be prioritised; and community initiatives need to be proactive and focused on enabling solutions. For sequencing data to deliver their full potential they must be connected to knowledge: together, molecular sequence data collection initiatives and biodiversity research infrastructures can advance global efforts to prevent further decline of Earth's biodiversity.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological Science DisciplinesComputational BiologyEuropeBioinformaticsData ManagementData StandardsGenetic ResourcesGenomicsSequencingTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID35999898
PMCPMC9360911
OpenAlexW4200466766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.